Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;37(3):215–231. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.02.2021.0020

Table 5.

The carrier and additive ratio optimization of the orthogonal test

No. Experimental factors (%)
WT (s) SR (%)
Carrier Dispersant Wetting agent Protectants
1 35 3 6 1.5 454 ± 5.8 c 78.11 ± 0.53 ab
2 35 4 8 2 87 ± 4.1 f 80.33 ± 5.02 a
3 35 5 10 2.5 36 ± 1.7 g 71.67 ± 2.62 cd
4 40 3 8 2.5 810 ± 3.3 b 61.89 ± 1.48 e
5 40 4 10 1.5 50 ± 2.5 f 73.89 ± 2.48 c
6 40 5 6 2 104 ± 2.9 e 62.56 ± 3.87 e
7 45 3 10 2 162 ± 5.7 e 69.22 ± 1.52 d
8 45 4 6 2.5 1,524 ± 2.5 a 61.22 ± 2.43 e
9 45 5 8 1.5 238 ± 6.8 d 75.44 ± 1.02 b
K1 577 1,426 2,082 742
K2 964 1,661 1,135 353
K3 1,924 378 248 2,370
R 1,347 1,283 1,834 2,017
k1 231.11 210.22 202.89 228.44
k2 198.34 215.44 217.66 212.11
k3 205.88 209.67 214.78 194.78
r 32.77 5.77 14.77 33.66

Values are presented as the mean ± SD, and data with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.

WT, wetting time; SR, suspension rate; Ki (column m) = the sum of the number in column m corresponding to the ‘i ‘index; R, range; R (column m) = the difference between the maximum and the minimum in each average of column m K1, K2, etc.