Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;8:680742. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.680742

Table 3.

The top 4 phyla in the ileal and cecal microbiota of broiler chickens1.

Item Control Cp Lf_Cp Bc_Cp SEM P-value
Day 21
Ileum
   Firmicutes 72.66b 90.87a 92.06a 77.04ab 3.09 0.049
   Bacteroidetes 9.30 3.61 2.62 11.79 1.45 0.232
   Proteobacteria 7.80 2.55 2.73 5.02 0.87 0.107
   Cyanobacteria 8.74 2.12 1.75 3.34 1.22 0.612
Cecum
   Firmicutes 58.79 63.94 62.32 62.50 1.74 0.775
   Bacteroidetes 36.85 32.30 34.78 32.74 1.86 0.830
   Verrucomicrobia 3.04 2.30 1.94 3.09 0.42 0.740
   Proteobacteria 1.18 1.22 0.76 1.50 0.22 0.719
Day 28
Ileum
   Firmicutes 39.26 49.47 45.19 46.23 5.09 0.923
   Cyanobacteria 36.87 40.79 31.50 26.18 4.66 0.727
   Proteobacteria 16.20 8.78 16.44 26.10 3.27 0.329
   Bacteroidetes 6.47a 0.69b 4.76ab 1.19b 1.08 0.023
Cecum
   Firmicutes 59.58 62.86 62.83 66.40 2.66 0.860
   Bacteroidetes 29.09 33.12 32.35 27.70 2.62 0.879
   Proteobacteria 9.47a 1.69b 2.86b 4.61b 0.90 0.005
   Tenericutes 0.85 0.38 1.28 1.02 0.17 0.285
1

Data are expressed as mean and pooled SEM from 8 and 7 chickens on days 21 and 28, respectively.

a, b

Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at P < 0.05. Control, unchallenged group; Cp, Clostridium perfringens-challenged group; Lf_Cp, challenged group with dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus fermentum; Bc_Cp, challenged group with dietary supplementation of Bacillus coagulans.