TABLE 8.
Survey results: Understanding of mathematics by effect size.
| Study | Survey items | nobservation | TC M (SD) | FC M (SD) | p | d |
| Peterson, 2016 | Clear explanations | TC = 12, FC = 21 | 4.33 (0.89) | 4.86 (0.36) | 0.02 | 0.78 |
| Amstelveen, 2019 | Supplementary material helped me learn the course material | TC = 20, FC = 29 | 2.94 (1.39) | 3.79 (1.37) | 0.039 | 0.62 |
| Cronhjort et al., 2018 | Related the course contents to real world examples | TC = 413, FC = 226 | 2.67 | 2.94 | 0.048 | n/a |
| Amstelveen, 2019 | Frequent feedback helped me improve my learning in the course | TC = 20, FC = 29 | 2.95 (1.35) | 3.46 (1.4) | 0.210 | 0.37 |
| Cronhjort et al., 2018 | The course felt relevant to my on-going studies | TC = 413, FC = 226 | 4.24 | 4.38 | 0.118 | n/a |
| Zack et al., 2015 | A strong math background can help me in my professional life | TC = 64, FC = 49 | 3.62 | 3.25 | 0.029 | n/a |
| Zack et al., 2015 | I believe that studying math helps me with problem solving in other areas | TC = 64, FC = 49 | 3.57 | 3.02 | 0.002 | n/a |
Bold values indicate significant results.