Table 4. Evaluation of RNAmining performance according to different sets of artificial sequences from each trained model.
F1-score metrics for 10 datasets of artificial sequences randomly generated for each species. The mean, minimum and maximum values are displayed separated by organism. Other metrics (sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy and the confusion matrix) used for the comparisons were made available at the Extended data: Supplementary File S4 19 .
| Species | MEAN | MINIMUM | MAXIMUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anolis carolinensis | 1.66 | 0.86 | 2.44 |
| Chrysemys picta bellii | 1.08 | 0.70 | 1.40 |
| Crocodylus porosus | 0.95 | 0.43 | 1.72 |
| Danio rerio | 1.25 | 0.12 | 2.21 |
| Eptatretus burgeri | 2.31 | 0.90 | 3.51 |
| Gallus gallus | 2.48 | 1.88 | 2.89 |
| Homo sapiens | 11.15 | 10.53 | 11.52 |
| Latimeria chalumnae | 24.86 | 21.95 | 27.03 |
| Monodelphis domestica | 1.34 | 1.00 | 1.18 |
| Mus musculus | 6.64 | 5.74 | 7.58 |
| Notechis scutatus | 1.80 | 0.58 | 3.99 |
| Ornithorhynchus anatinus | 3.62 | 2.67 | 5.04 |
| Petromyzon marinus | 64.13 | 62.99 | 65.76 |
| Sphenodon punctatus | 37.43 | 31.72 | 41.84 |
| Xenopus tropicalis | 23.26 | 17.65 | 28.21 |