Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 26;2014(8):CD006884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006884.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Methotrexate compared to placebo for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

Methotrexate compared to placebo for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease
Patient or population: patients with quiescent Crohn's disease
 Settings: Outpatient
 Intervention: Methotrexate
 Comparison: Placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo Methotrexate
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission 
 Follow‐up: 36‐40 weeks 458 per 10001 720 per 1000 
 (504 to 1000) RR 1.57 
 (1.10 to 2.23) 98
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate2  
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission (high dose intramuscular methotrexate 15 mg/week) 
 Follow‐up: 40 weeks 389 per 10001 650 per 1000 
 (408 to 1000) RR 1.67 
 (1.05 to 2.67) 76
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate3  
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission (low dose oral methotrexate 12.5 mg/week) 
 Follow‐up: 36 weeks 667 per 10001 900 per 1000 
 (574 to 1000) RR 1.35 
 (0.86 to 2.12) 22
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low4  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Control group risk comes from control arm of study
 2 Sparse data (57 events)
 3 Sparse data (40 events)
 4 Very sparse data (17 events)