Table 21:
Clinical Parameters (Technical and Clinical Failures) Used in the Economic Model—Reference Case
| Overall Probability | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Potential Occurrence | Distribution | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAE | ||||||
| Technical failure | 5.26%a | 0% | 11.06% | Perioperative | Beta | Gao et al, 201413 |
| Clinical failure | Ongoing | NAb | ||||
| End of year 2 | 9.26%c | — | — | Gao et al, 201413 | ||
| Year 3 to end of time horizon | 3.86%d | — | — | Pisco et al, 201668 | ||
| TURP | ||||||
| Clinical failure | Ongoing | NAb | ||||
| End of year 2 | 3.77%c | — | — | Gao et al, 201413 | ||
| Year 3 to end of time horizon | 2.90%d | — | — | Strope et al, 201574 | ||
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; NA, not applicable; PAE, prostatic artery embolization; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate.
Probability applied as a one-time probability in the model.
There are no 95% confidence intervals or distributions associated with these probabilities because we calibrated our model parameters against the mean probabilities only.
IPSS criteria for clinical failure: decrease in IPSS of ≤ 25% and IPSS ≥ 18. Criteria is based on Gao et al, 2014.13 In this model, those meeting both criteria would fail first, followed by those meeting one of the two components (if any).
IPSS criteria for clinical failure: decrease in IPSS of ≤ 25% and IPSS ≥ 15. Criteria is based on Pisco et al, 2016.68 In this model, those meeting both criteria would fail first, followed by those meeting one of the two components (if any).