Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;67(6):439–448. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6706439

Table 2.

Sample characteristics of interview respondents

CHARACTERISTIC FAMILY PHYSICIANS
n (%), N = 17
PEDIATRICIANS
n (%), N = 4
MIDWIVES
n (%), N = 13*
TOTAL
n (%), N = 34
Practice setting
  • Academic  0 (0.0) 1 (25.0)  0 (0.0)  1 (2.9)
  • Non-academic 17 (100.0) 3 (75.0) 13 (100.0) 33 (97.1)
Practice type
  • Solo  1 (5.9) 0 (0.0)  1 (7.7)  2 (5.9)
  • Group 16 (94.1) 4 (100.0) 12 (92.3) 32 (94.1)
Method of reimbursement
  • Fee-for-service§  4 (23.5) 3 (75.0)  0 (0.0)  7 (20.6)
  • Non–fee-for-service 13 (76.5) 1 (25.0) 13 (100.0) 27 (79.4)
Practice location
  • Urban  9 (52.9) 4 (100.0) 10 (76.9) 23 (67.6)
  • Rural  8 (47.1) 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 11 (32.4)
Years in practice
  • 0-15 13 (76.5) 3 (75.0) 11 (84.6) 27 (79.4)
  • ≥ 16  4 (23.5) 1 (25.0)  2 (15.4)  7 (20.6)
Sex
  • Female 14 (82.4) 4 (100.0) 13 (100.0) 31 (91.2)
  • Male  3 (17.6) 0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)  3 (8.8)
Practice-based exposure to …
  • CF  4 (23.5) 2 (50.0)  3 (23.1)  9 (26.5)
  • CF carrier  6 (35.3) 1 (25.0)  6 (46.2) 13 (38.2)
  • NBS results positive for CF  4 (23.5) 2 (50.0)  7 (53.8) 13 (38.2)
  • NBS results positive for another disorder  5 (29.4) 4 (100.0)  8 (61.5) 17 (50.0)

CF—cystic fibrosis, NBS—newborn screening.

*Fifteen midwives were interviewed but the audio for 1 interview (with 2 midwives) did not record properly, so data are reported for 13 participants.

Includes providers who see any patients in academic health sciences centres.

Includes interprofessional practice as well as single-discipline group practice.

§Includes providers who reported any fee-for-service. Midwives in Ontario are publicly funded but not fee-for-service.