Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;13(10):14039–14052. doi: 10.18632/aging.203022

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of epigenetic aging indicators according to the combined healthy lifestyle score.

Characteristics All 0-1 2 3 4 P
Number of participants 286 50 94 97 45
Chronological age (mean (SD)) 48.9(10.6) 49.9(11.2) 49.4 (10.3) 48.6 (10.6) 47.4(10.6) 0.646
Horvath_mage (mean (SD)) 53.6 (8.9) 54.1 (9.3) 54.0 (8.3) 53.6 (9.2) 52.3 (8.9) 0.720
Li_mage (mean (SD)) 48.4 (10.6) 49.0 (10.7) 49.2 (10.4) 48.4(10.9) 46.2 (9.9) 0.446
Horvath_AA (mean (SD)) 0.0 (3.7) -0.3(3.9) 0.1 (3.0) 0.2 (4.3) -0.2 (3.7) 0.860
Li_AA(mean (SD)) 0.0 (4.3) -0.3 (3.1) 0.4 (4.3) 0.2 (5.2) -0.9 (3.0) 0.401
Horvath_IEAA (mean (SD)) 0.0 (3.5) 0.2 (3.8) 0.1 (2.9) 0.1 (4.0) -0.6 (3.5) 0.716
Li_IEAA (mean (SD)) 0.0 (4.1) -0.2 (3.1) 0.3 (4.1) 0.3 (4.8) -1.0 (3.2) 0.268

Note: mage: DNA methylation age; AA:age acceleration; IEAA: intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration, Li and Horvath present two algorithms for calculating mage respectively.