Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 14;16(6):e0252709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252709

Table 8. Bivariate Bayesian correlates between the Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs) and the other variables in the study.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
(1) WB-NRS 1 - .50 .33 .40 .60 .47 -.38 .27 .29
(2) WB-NRS 2 .42 - .53 .56 .82 .71 -.65 .49 .54
(3) WB-NRS 3 .39 .65 - .44 .67 .50 -.43 .37 .40
(4) WB-NRS 4 .37 .58 .51 - .58 .50 -.48 .34 .32
(5) WB-NRS 5 .53 .81 .74 .65 - .70 -.63 .49 .51
(6) WHO-5 .38 .61 .49 .47 .66 - -.66 .50 .55
(7) PSS-4 -.29 -.66 -.47 -.46 -.66 -.63 - -.70 -.63
(8) PSMS .28 .50 .42 .41 .49 .46 -.56 - .66
(9) LOT-R .29 .39 .34 .37 .43 .47 -.51 .50 -

Note. Below Diagonal = Italian sample (N = 342); above Diagonal = Canadian sample (N = 283). WHO-5 = World Health Organization Well-Being Index; PSS-4 = Perceived Stress Scale; PSMS = Pearlin-Schooler Mastery Scale; LOT-R = Life Orientation Test Revised. BF10>100 for all the correlations.