Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 14;2021(6):CD009294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009294.pub3

Porena 2010.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomized controlled trial
Setting/country: single center in Italy
Dates when study was conducted: January 2004 to December 2006
Participants Ethnicity: NA
Inclusion criteria
  • Ages 18–75 years

  • Primary diagnosis of high‐risk superficial bladder cancer according to EAU guidelines

  • Participants having never been treated with other intravesical chemotherapeutic agents, and consenting to participate in the study


Exclusion criteria
  • Concomitant tumors

  • Urinary tract infections

  • Altered function of the liver, kidneys, bone marrow, or a combination of these; major cardiovascular diseases

  • Life expectancy < 1 year

  • Intravesical chemotherapy in the previous 3 months or immunotherapy in the previous 6 months

  • Systemic chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy prior to TURBT, and any condition that, in the judgment of the investigators, would interfere with the person's ability to provide informed consent, comply with study instructions, place the person at increased risk, or which might confound interpretation of study results


Total number of participants randomly assigned
  • Screened: 74

  • Eligible: 64


Disease type: primary high‐risk disease
Intervention: gemcitabine
  • Number of all participants randomly assigned: 32

  • Age: mean 70.2 (SD 5.5) years

  • Gender (men/women): 26/6

  • Tumor T stage and grade

    • Ta‐T1 G3: 26; T1 G3 or CIS or G3 + CIS: 6

  • Tumor size (< 3 cm/≥ 3 cm): NA

  • Number of tumors (1/> 1): NA


Comparator: BCG
  • Number of all participants randomly assigned: 32

  • Age: mean 68.7 (SD 10.2) years

  • Gender (men/women): 28/4

  • Tumor T stage and grade

    • Ta‐T1 G3: 28; T1 G3 or CIS or G3 + CIS: 4

  • Tumor size (< 3 cm/≥ 3 cm): NA

  • Number of tumors (1/> 1): NA

Interventions Intervention: gemcitabine
  • Gemcitabine 2000 mg/50 mL saline

  • 14 days after the second‐look TUR, 6 weekly instillations of gemcitabine held in bladder for 2 hours as induction therapy. If there was no recurrence, participants received maintenance therapy 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months


Comparator: BCG
  • BCG (Tice strain) 5 × 108 CFU/50 mL saline

  • 14 days after the second‐look TUR, 6 weekly instillations of BCG held in bladder for 2 hours as induction therapy. If there was no recurrence, participants received maintenance therapy 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months


Follow‐up: mean 44 months
Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Recurrence and progression rates; intervals before recurrence and progression

  • How measured: cytology, cystoscopy, and cold‐cup biopsy of any suspicious lesions

  • Time point measured: every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the following 3 years, and then annually

  • Time point reported: NA


Secondary outcomes
  • Tolerability (dropped out of the study, and safety)

  • How measured: recording of adverse events

  • Time point measured: NA

  • Time point reported: likely cumulative


Subgroup analysis: none
Funding Sources NA
Declarations of interest NA
Notes Protocol: NCT00696579
Language of publication: English
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote from publication: "the randomisation code was developed using a computer random number generator to select random permuted blocks."
Comment: we considered this method of random sequence generation to have low risk of bias.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no information given.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Quote from publication: "All study personnel and participants were not blinded to treatment assignment."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes High risk Quote from publication: "All study personnel and participants were not blinded to treatment assignment."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Comment: objective outcomes not likely affected by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Time to recurrence Low risk Comment: no loss to follow‐up; all randomized participants were included in the analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Time to progression Low risk Comment: no loss to follow‐up; all randomized participants were included in the analysis (no progression in both arms).
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Grade III–V adverse events Low risk Comment: all randomized participants were included in the analysis, but no explicit description of grade III–V complications.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Grade I or II adverse events Low risk Comment: all randomized participants were included in the analysis, but no explicit description of grade I or II complications.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: the protocol (NCT00696579) and all predefined outcomes were provided.
Other bias Low risk Comment: not detected.

BCG: Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin; CFU: colony‐forming units; CIS: carcinoma in situ; EAU: European Association of Urology; EORTC QLQ‐C30: European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; EORTC QLQ‐BLS 24: European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Superficial Bladder Cancer‐Specific 24; G: tumor grade; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; NMIBC: non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer; NA: not available; SD: standard deviation; TCC: transitional cell carcinoma; TUR: transurethral resection; TURBT: transurethral resection of the bladder tumor; WHO: World Health Organization.