Porena 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Setting/country: single center in Italy Dates when study was conducted: January 2004 to December 2006 |
|
Participants |
Ethnicity: NA Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total number of participants randomly assigned
Disease type: primary high‐risk disease Intervention: gemcitabine
Comparator: BCG
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention: gemcitabine
Comparator: BCG
Follow‐up: mean 44 months |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
Subgroup analysis: none |
|
Funding Sources | NA | |
Declarations of interest | NA | |
Notes |
Protocol: NCT00696579 Language of publication: English |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk |
Quote from publication: "the randomisation code was developed using a computer random number generator to select random permuted blocks." Comment: we considered this method of random sequence generation to have low risk of bias. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information given. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote from publication: "All study personnel and participants were not blinded to treatment assignment." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | Quote from publication: "All study personnel and participants were not blinded to treatment assignment." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk | Comment: objective outcomes not likely affected by lack of blinding. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Time to recurrence | Low risk | Comment: no loss to follow‐up; all randomized participants were included in the analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Time to progression | Low risk | Comment: no loss to follow‐up; all randomized participants were included in the analysis (no progression in both arms). |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Grade III–V adverse events | Low risk | Comment: all randomized participants were included in the analysis, but no explicit description of grade III–V complications. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Grade I or II adverse events | Low risk | Comment: all randomized participants were included in the analysis, but no explicit description of grade I or II complications. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol (NCT00696579) and all predefined outcomes were provided. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: not detected. |
BCG: Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin; CFU: colony‐forming units; CIS: carcinoma in situ; EAU: European Association of Urology; EORTC QLQ‐C30: European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; EORTC QLQ‐BLS 24: European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Superficial Bladder Cancer‐Specific 24; G: tumor grade; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; NMIBC: non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer; NA: not available; SD: standard deviation; TCC: transitional cell carcinoma; TUR: transurethral resection; TURBT: transurethral resection of the bladder tumor; WHO: World Health Organization.