Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 14;11:12428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91985-8

Table 2.

Biolistic transformation in sugarcane and selection of transgenic plants.

Variety Total no of calli bombarded No of calli survived on kanamycine selection (%) No of calli survived on kanamycine + glyphosate selection (%) No of calli regenerated on selection medium (%) Regenerated plantlets on selection media Plantlets after GUS assay screening multiplied in the tubes PCR (GTGene) screening and in the process of acclimatization In tubes on rooting media Shifted to green house in soil pots Survived (one and half month old plants) after spray 900 mL/ 80 L/acre In field 2-month old plants after glyphosate spray 1100 mL/80 L Spray tolerant (1200 mL/80 L/acr) plants further analyzed for three genes through PCR, Southern Blot, DIPSTICK and ELISA Positive for CEMB-Cry1Ac Positive for CEMB-Cry2A Positive for CEMB-GTGene Three genes positive plants (transgenic plants survived in field after glyphosate spray (1200 mL/80 L/acre) Transformation efficiency (%)
SPF-213 100 70 34 21 500 1000 800 752 656 200 122 54 27 14 11 27 11 1.1
SPF-234 100 74 40 32 600 1000 700 680 525 250 141 90 39 15 13 39 13 1.3
HSF-240 100 45 29 13 300 1000 320 205 125 75 60 40 15 11 10 15 10 1
CPF-246 100 91 81 48 950 1000 966 900 900 900 751 300 66 30 15 66 15 1.5
Total 147 71 58 147 49