Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;17(7):1085–1096. doi: 10.1002/alz.12249

TABLE 2.

Systematic Literature Review of Studies Examining Aβ Biomarkers and Cortical Integrity in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

Study Cohort N Mean age (SD) Biomarker modality GM∼Aβ GM∼Tau Description of findings:
Desikan et al. PLoS One 2010 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) 208 76.0 (4.9) CSF Neg Neg Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in F. Tau+ subjects had decreased GM compared to tau– subjects in T.
Glodzik et al. Neurobiol Aging 2012 Center for Brain Health and Alzheimer's Disease Center at NYU School of Medicine 115 62.6 (9.5) CSF Neg Neg Aβ+/tau+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ–/tau– subjects in P, T, L, W. Tau negatively predicted GM in P, T. Tau+ subjects had decreased GM compared to tau– subjects in P, L, T.
Stricker et al. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 ADNI 103 75.5 (5.21) CSF Null Neg In all subjects, tau negatively predicted F GM.
Fortea et al. Alzheimers Dement 2014 ADNI 145 73.4 (6.2) CSF Pos Neg In tau– subjects, Aβ positively predicted P, O, T, GM. In Aβ+ subjects, tau negatively predicted F, P, O, T GM.
Wang et al. Neurology 2015 Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Washington University 188 73.0 (6.0) CSF Null Neg In tau+ subjects, tau negatively predicted P, O, T, L GM.
Pettigrew et al. Neuroimage Clin 2017 Biomarkers of Cognitive Decline Among Normal Individuals (BIOCARD) 207 56.9 (10.0) CSF Null Null  
Maass et al. J Neurosci 2018 Berkeley Aging Cohort Study (BACS) 83 77 (6) PET Null Neg In all subjects, tau negatively predicted T GM. In Aβ+ subjects, tau was negatively related to change in T GM. In Aβ– subjects, tau was negatively related to change in T GM.
Montal et al. Alzheimers Dement 2018 Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Satander, Spain; CITA Alzheimer, San Sebastian, Spain 254 58.6 (7.7) CSF Neg, Pos Neg Aβ+/tau‐–subjects had increased GM compared to Aβ–/tau– subjects in P, T. Aβ+/T+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ–/tau– subjects in T.
Batzu et al. Neurobiol Aging 2019 ADNI 122 72.3 (5.7) CSF Neg, Pos Neg Aβ+/tau– subjects had increased GM compared to Aβ–/tau– subjects in F, P, O. Aβ+/tau+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ–/tau– subjects in F.
Luo et al. Front Neurosci 2019 ADNI 76 75.0 (5.5) CSF Null Null
Becker et al. Ann Neurol 2011 Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women's Hospitals, and referring memory clinics (S.S., G.M., and D.M.) 87 75.0 (8.0) PET Neg N/A In all subjects, Aβ negatively predicted F, P, T, L GM. Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in F, P, L.
Arenaza‐Urquijo et al. J Alzheimers Dis 2013 Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain 33 70.3 (7.1) CSF Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in F, P, T, L.
Doré et al. JAMA Neurol 2013 Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of Ageing (AIBL) 93 73.9 (7.4) PET Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM in P, L compared to Aβ– subjects. In Aβ+ subjects, Aβ negatively predicted P, T, L GM. Aβ+ subjects had an increased rate of GM atrophy than Aβ– subjects in P, T, L.
Whitwell et al. Neuroimage Clin 2013 Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) 230 80* PET Neg, Pos N/A Aβ+ subjects had increased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in P; Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in F, O, P, T
Kljajevic et al. Neurobiol Aging 2014 ADNI 57 76.7 (5.8) PET Null N/A  
Araque et al. Neurobiol Aging 2015 ADNI 40 75.2 (6.8) PET Neg N/A In all subjects, Aβ+ subjects had a higher rate of GM atrophy compared to Aβ– in P, O, L.
Doherty et al. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2015 Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) 109 60.7 (5.7) PET Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in T.
Kaffashian et al. Neurobiol Aging 2015 Three‐City Dijon Study 1187 72.0 (3.98) CSF Neg N/A Subjects in the highest tertile of Aβ at baseline and follow‐up had faster GM atrophy in W than those in the lowest tertile.
Llado‐Saz et al. Neurobiol Aging 2015 Laboratory of Functional Neuroscience at Pablo de Olavide University 120 68.9 (3.7) CSF Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in F, T.
Mattsson et al. Neurology 2015 ADNI 280 73.6(6.3) PET Null N/A  
Susanto et al. J Alzheimers Dis 2015 ADNI 103 75.5 (5.2) CSF Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ–subjects in P.
Hanseeuw et al. Alzheimers Dement 2016 Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS) 250 73.8 (6.0) PET Null N/A  
Hedden et al. Cereb Cortex 2016 HABS 186 73.8 (6.0) PET Neg N/A In all subjects, Aβ negatively predicted T, L GM.
Li et al. J Alzheimers Dis 2017 ADNI 251 75.5 (6.5) PET Null N/A  
Sala‐Llonch et al. J Alzheimers Dis 2017 N/A 89 73.1 (6.0) CSF Neg N/A In Aβ+ subjects, Aβ negatively predicted F GM.
Voevodskaya et al. Neurobiol Aging 2017 Biomarkers for Identifying Neurodegenerative Disorders Early and Reliably (BioFinder) 299 73.3 (5.0) CSF Null N/A  
Wolk et al. Neurobiol Aging 2017 ADNI 86 74.3 (6.9) PET Null N/A  
Knopman et al. Neurobiol Aging 2018 MCSA 1164 70.0 (10.0) PET Neg N/A In all subjects, Aβ negatively predicted O, T GM.
Ten Kate et al. Alzheimers Res Ther 2018 European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer's Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF‐AD MBD) 337 66.5 (7.2) PET Neg N/A Aβ+ subjects had decreased GM compared to Aβ– subjects in O, T.
Haller et al. Front Neurosci 2019 University Hospitals of Geneva 133 76.8 (4.0) PET Null N/A
Rabin et al. JAMA Neurol 2019 HABS 182 73.4 (6.2) PET Neg N/A In all subjects, Aβ negatively predicted W GM.
Rahayel et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019 Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM) 103 73.4 (6.2) PET Neg, Pos N/A In all subjects, Aβ negatively predicted F and positively predicted F, T GM.

Abbreviations: Aβ, amyloid beta; F, frontal lobe; GM, gray matter; L, limbic lobe (cingulate gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, dentate gyrus); Neg, negative association between pathology biomarker and cortical measure; Null, no significant association between pathology biomarker and cortical measure; O, occipital lobe; P, parietal lobe; Pos, positive association between pathology biomarker and cortical measure; SD, standard deviation; T, temporal lobe; W, whole cortex.

Notes: Studies testing cross‐sectional associations between Aβ and cortical integrity (thickness or volume) in cognitively healthy older adults. Citation, cohort, sample size, mean age, and pathology biomarker modality are listed in addition to a brief summary of results. The locations of cortical areas with significant results are noted by the lobe of the brain for brevity. Studies including Aβ and tau biomarkers are listed in chronological order followed by studies with only an Aβ biomarker in chronological order.

*This study reported a median age.