Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;12:667832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.667832

TABLE 5.

Prevalence (%) and concentration of immune factors in fecal samples from healthy control and bronchiolitis groups.

Healthy (n = 15)
Bronchiolitis (n = 48)
Immune factor n (%) Median (IQR) n (%) Median (IQR) p value# p value‡
APRIL/TNFSF13, μg/L 6 (40) 2.38 (2.00–2.65) 4 (8) 1.58 (1.37–2.27) 0.008 0.336
BAFF/TNFSF13B, μg/L 15 (100) 0.85 (0.50–1.45) 47 (98) 1.89 (1.29–2.82) 1.000 0.011
Chitinase 3-like 1, μg/L 15 (100) 1.56 (0.19–3.48) 42 (88) 0.99 (0.42–2.63) 0.321 0.986
IFNα2, ng/L 2 (13) 37.30 (32.61–42.00) 0 (0) 0.054
IFNβ, ng/L 8 (53) 9.34 (5.61–18.83) 6 (13) 11.07 (7.62–17.12) 0.002 0.796
IFNγ, ng/L 5 (33) 16.86 (16.64–19.72) 2 (4) 19.13 (15.38–22.87) 0.007 0.699
IL2, ng/L 2 (13) 15.17 (12.01–18.34) 0 (0) 0.054
IL8, ng/L 4 (27) 23.15 (16.20–30.35) 8 (17) 21.82 (14.26–98.67) 0.457 0.734
IL10, ng/L 3 (20) 5.31 (4.53–8.30) 2 (4) 4.30 (4.04–4.56) 0.083 0.564
IL11, ng/L 3 (20) 0.53 (0.50–2.14) 4 (8) 0.59 (0.51–0.72) 0.342 1.000
IL12p40, ng/L 5 (33) 32.84 (22.69–69.40) 7 (15) 26.12 (22.69–35.13) 0.137 0.465
IL12p70, ng/L 3 (20) 2.32 (2.15–2.79) 2 (4) 2.14 (1.65–2.62) 0.083 0.564
IL19, ng/L 3 (20) 17.84 (15.66–79.82) 0 (0) 0.011
IL20, ng/L 11 (73) 17.84 (12.52–21.19) 19 (40) 17.35 (11.31–21.32) 0.037 0.880
IL22, ng/L 1 (7) 22.1 0 (0) 0.238
IL26, ng/L 2 (13) 30.95 (28.67–33.22) 2 (4) 26.21 (25.92–26.49) 0.238 0.439
IL27p28, ng/L 2 (13) 55.46 (34.11–76.80) 9 (19) 18.93 (11.24–35.20) 0.721 0.480
IL28A/IFNλ2, ng/L 2 (13) 13.77 (11.11–16.42) 3 (6) 9.81 (9.75–11.15) 0.585 1.000
IL29/IFNλ1, ng/L 5 (33) 50.46 (28.18–62.00) 5 (10) 28.18 (27.16–36.82) 0.049 0.530
IL32, ng/L 11 (73) 17.34 (14.97–21.42) 16 (33) 25.35 (11.38–32.74) 0.008 0.587
IL34, ng/L 1 (7) 753.61 9 (19) 777.19 (750.98–944.30) 0.428
IL35, ng/L 3 (20) 222.05 (220.33–251.99) 3 (6) 89.72 (78.15–133.29) 0.141 0.050
LIGHT/TNFSF14, ng/L 11 (73) 63.18 (37.46–165.69) 11 (23) 54.59 (44.60–75.11) 0.001 0.533
MMP-1, μg/L 2 (13) 1.97 (1.80– 2.13) 1 (2) 1.19 0.138
MMP-2, μg/L 6 (40) 0.77 (0.54–0.89) 7 (15) 0.71 (0.54–0.93) 0.062 0.943
MMP-3, μg/L 5 (33) 0.55 (0.26–0.64) 5 (10) 0.32 (0.22–0.33) 0.049 0.347
Osteocalcin, μg/L 4 (27) 0.18 (0.14–0.23) 2 (4) 0.13 (0.10–0.16) 0.025 0.355
Osteopontin, μg/L 6 (40) 0.71 (0.52–0.92) 7 (15) 0.44 (0.42–0.62) 0.062 0.063
Pentraxin 3, ng/L 15 (100) 31.06 (23.32–43.24) 25 (52) 28.35 (15.32–46.39) 0.001 0.379
TSLP, ng/L 7 (47) 11.68 (9.25–22.10) 7 (15) 12.26 (9.00–14.81) 0.015 0.749
TWEAK/TNFSF12, μg/L 15 (100) 0.62 (0.22–1.11) 46 (96) 0.29 (0.10–0.77) 1.000 0.227
gp130/sIL-6Rβ, ng/L 5 (33) 93.86 (70.96–99.92) 17 (35) 90.92 (45.88–153.35) 1.000 0.969
sCD30/TNFRSF8, ng/L 4 (27) 10.54 (7.07–16.77) 5 (10) 7.67 (7.47–7.86) 0.198 1.000
sCD163, μg/L 6 (40) 0.94 (0.60–1.63) 13 (27) 0.87 (0.70–1.77) 0.520 0.930
sIL-6Rα, ng/L 4 (27) 14.38 (13.74–17.26) 5 (10) 10.88 (10.51–15.29) 0.198 0.462
sTNF-R1, ng/L 8 (53) 59.02 (34.09–137.82) 30 (63) 110.39 (59.70–369.67) 0.558 0.100
sTNF-R2, ng/L 2 (13) 56.25 (49.19–63.31) 6 (13) 101.21 (36.27–280.36) 1.000 1.000

APRIL/TNFSF13, A proliferation-inducing ligand/tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13; BAFF/TNFSF13B, B-cell activating factor/tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B; gp130/sIL-6Rβ, glycoprotein 130/soluble interleukin 6 receptor β; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; LIGHT/TNFSF14, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 14; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; sCD30/TNFRSF8, soluble cluster of differentiation 30/Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 8; sCD163, soluble cluster of differentiation 163; sIL-6Rα, soluble interleukin 6 receptor α; sTNF-R1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; sTNF-R2, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; TWEAK/TNFSF12, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 12. The prevalence is expressed as the number (percentage) of samples in which the immunological compound was detected and the relative abundance of the immunological compound as the median and the interquartile range (IQR). #Chi-squared or Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate differences in prevalence of the analyzed parameters. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate differences in concentration of the analyzed parameters. Bold font indicates values having differences that are statistically significant.