Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;11:665304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.665304

Table 2.

Studies assessing the impact of PSMA-PET/CT on salvage radiotherapy planning.

Authors Year n Median PSA (ng/ml) (range) PSA limit (ng/ml) PSMA+ Extra-pelvic PSMA+ Any SRT planning change
Van Leeuwen et al. (15) 2016 70 0.2 (0.05–0.99) <1 55% 6% 35%
Sterzing et al. (16) 2016 42 2.8 (0.16–113) None 60% N/A 61%
Bluemel et al. (17) 2016 45 0.67 (0.10–11.2) None 54% 9% 42%
Albisinni et al. (18) 2017 48 2.2 (0.72–6.7) None N/A N/A 76%
Habl et al. (19) 2017 83 0.69 (0.09–14.7) None 71% 10% 57%
Koerber et al. (20) 2018 71 1.2 (0.03–41.24) None N/A 51% 54%
Frenzel et al. (21) 2018 75 0.2 (0.02–653.2) None N/A N/A 43%
Farolfi et al. (11) 2019 119 0.32 (0.20–0.50) <0.5 35% 21% 30%
Calais et al. (22) 2018 270 0.48 (0.03–1.0) <1 49% 13% 19%
Schmidt-Hegemann et al. (23) 2019 62 0.44 (0.15–6.24) None 54% 3% 50%
Boreta et al. (24) 2019 125 0.4 (0.28–0.63) ≤2.0 53% 20% 30%
Current study 2020 76 0.25 (0.07–0.50) <0.5 54% 3% 28%

N/A, not available.