Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;7(3):385–398. doi: 10.1002/cre2.405

TABLE 1.

Tool for critical appraisal of studies of economic evaluation of prognostic multivariable methods and models for prediction of caries and periodontitis

First author
Journal/year/volume/pages Evaluated by Date Yes No Unclear NA
Domain 1: Sample
Was target population to whom prediction method/model applies described?
Was setting of recruitment described (e.g., primary care, secondary care, general population)?
Were number, age and sex of included individuals presented?
Was disease prevalence of included groups presented?
Was study dates presented?
Domain 2: Method/model for prediction of caries and/or periodontitis (index test)
Was method for prediction described to permit replication?
Was model with types and handling of predictors described to permit replication?
Were examination method(s) and measurements presented?
Was number of examiners and their experience described?
If implemented was thresholds clearly described?
Was timing of measurement of predictor(s) described?
Domain 3: Outcome to be predicted (reference standard) and method/model performance
Was type of outcome(s) to be predicted defined?
Were outcome thresholds and criteria for thresholds clearly described?
Were examination method(s) and measurements presented?
Was outcome assessed without knowledge of candidate predictors (blinded assessment)?
Was performance of model or method presented adequately?
Domain 4: Economic evaluation
Was the study design appropriate?
If simulation was used was the model transparent?
Was the perspective of the evaluation presented?
Were all relevant costs identified, presented and valued?
Was time horizon long enough to reflect all relevant costs and effects?
Were outcome measures captured and quantified for all important effects?
Was discount rate(s) stated?
Was uncertainty considered?
Domain 5: Analysis and interpretation of results
Was the result presented as costs related to effects (ratio)?
Was sensitivity analysis with relevant variables performed?
Is the result robust in regard to results of sensitivity analysis?
Is the result transferable to other settings?
Is the analysis helpful for a decision‐maker?
Comments
Not applicable