Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2021 Jun 14;2021:10.17912/micropub.biology.000408. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000408

DMD-10 is dispensable for the initial development of amphid sensory neurons and their survival in mature C. elegans

Irene Nguyen 1, Eric S Luth 1,§
Reviewed by: Caroline (Lina) Lund Dahlberg
PMCID: PMC8204158  PMID: 34142022

Abstract

Mechanosensory or chemosensory activation of glutamatergicASH amphid sensory neurons promotes avoidancebehaviors in C. elegans. Wormswith mutations in the transcription factor DMD-10 have impaired ASH-mediated sensorimotor reflexes. We hypothesized that the behavioral dysfunction in dmd-10 mutants could arise from impaired ASH development or survival leading to disrupted glutamatergic signaling.To test this, we performed in vivo fluorescence microscopy of young adult C. elegans amphid neurons after labeling with the lipophilic dye DiI. We quantified the number of ASH neurons as well as five other amphid sensory neuron pairs. We found that the number of amphid neurons in dmd-10 mutants was the same as in wild-type worms. Our results suggest that dmd-10 is not required for amphid neuron development or survival in mature C. elegans.


Figure 1. dmd-10 mutant worms display the typical number of amphid sensory neurons pairs.

Figure 1. dmd-10 mutant worms display the typical number of amphid sensory neurons pairs

(A) Map of the positions of C. elegans ASH, ADL, ASI, AWB, ASK, and ASJ sensory neurons. (B-D) DiI labeled ASH, ASI, ADL, ASK, AWB, and ASJ sensory neurons of a representative wildtype (WT)(B) cam-1 (C) and dmd-10 (D) wormvisualized via fluorescence microscopy. Images show the presence of each fluorescently-labeled sensory neuron cell body (white solid arrows) in both the left (L) and right (R) sets. Yellow arrowheads note missing ASI cell bodies in cam-1 worms. (E) Graphs show the proportion worms with DiI filled amphid neurons for each genotype (WT n=34, cam-1 n=36, dmd-10 n=31). Unfilled portion of each bar represents proportion of worms with 1 out of 2 neurons observed. *=p<0.05 Chi-squared test, cam-1 compared to wildtype.

Description

The C elegans transcription factor DMD-10 is an ortholog of the human DBRTB, a Doublesex/MAB-3(DM)-related transcription factor. Young adult dmd-10 (gk1131) loss-of-function mutant C. elegans exhibit selective defects in sensorimotor behaviors (Durbeck et al. 2021). They are less responsive to nose-touch mechanosensory stimulation and high osmolarity, both of which are transduced by a pair of ASH sensory neurons (Kaplan and Horvitz 1993; Bargmann 2006; Lindsay et al. 2011) dmd-10 mutants also show an approximately 50% decrease in their behavioral response to direct, optogenetic activation of channelrhodopsin-2 expressed under the control of promoters whose expression patterns overlap only in ASH (Ezcurra et al. 2011; Durbeck et al. 2021). Considering the known effects of other DM domain-containing proteins on neuronal development (Tresser et al. 2010; Yoshizawa et al. 2011; Saulnier et al. 2013), one potential explanation for this could be that one of the two ASH neurons does not develop properly or survive in adult dmd-10 mutant animals.

We set out to determine whether the number of ASH neurons is altered in dmd-10 mutants. The left and right pairs of ASH sensory neurons and five other nearby ciliated sensory neuron pairs (ASI, ADL, ASK, AWB, and ASJ) are found in the amphids, a pair of sensilla in the heads of nematodes like C. elegans (Inglis et al. 2007). These cells can all be labeled with the lipophilic fluorescent dye DiI (1,1-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocynanine perchlorate) and identified based on their stereotyped position (Shaham 2006) (Fig. 1A). DiI intercalates into the lipids of the ciliated dendrites of sensory neurons that protrude outside the worm cuticle and ultimately labels the entire plasma membrane of these cells (Collet et al. 1998; Schultz and Gumienny 2012). Because recent tissue-specific and single-cell gene expression studies indicate that dmd-10 may be expressed in ciliated sensory neurons including ASK (Cao et al. 2018; Packer et al. 2019), we expanded our analysis to quantify all amphid sensory neurons that are labeled with DiI.

To test our hypothesis that DMD-10 is required for formation or survival of amphid sensory neurons, we incubated N2 wildtype and dmd-10 mutant young adult worms with DiI and performed in vivo fluorescence microscopy. We chose to examine young adult worms because behavioral defects were previously observed in this developmental stage (Durbeck et al.. 2021). To determine whether our methods were reliable enough to detect the absence of a single amphid neuron or a pair of amphid neurons in DiI-labeled worms, we similarly imaged cam-1/kin-8 (ks52) mutant worms. Consistent with a previous report (Koga et al. 1999), we saw that cam-1/kin-8 mutants had a specific dye-filling defect in ASI neurons (Fig. 1C, E).

Fluorescence imaging of dmd-10 (gk1131) mutants revealed no differences in the number of ASH sensory neurons between the N2 wildtype (WT) and dmd-10 mutant worms (Fig. 1B, D, E). We also found no differences in the number of ADL, ASI, AWB, ASK, or ASJ amphid sensory neurons (Fig. 1B, D, E). We observed all six of these sensory neurons in both the left and right side of the head of dmd-10 mutants (Figure 1D, E). This indicates that there were no gross defects in the presence or morphology of amphid neurons and suggests that mutation of dmd-10 does not affect amphid neuron development or survival into young adulthood.

Dmd-10 mutants have defects in ASH-dependent behaviors (Durbek et al. 2021), but our data suggests this cannot be attributed to impaired ASH development or survival. We found that amphid sensory neurons of dmd-10 mutants appear in the stereotypical, wildtype positions and appropriately extend ciliated dendrites into the external environment. It remains possible that, despite their unaltered gross morphology, ASH neurons in dmd-10 mutants may be functionally impaired. Future studies will be needed to identify the function of dmd-10 in ASH and in other amphid neurons in which it is expressed (Cao et al. 2018; Packer et al. 2019). Because other C. elegans DMD family members have been shown to regulate sexually-dimorphic neuronal connectivity (Oren-Suissa et al. 2016, Serrano-Saiz et al. 2017), it will also be interesting to examine differences in sensory neuron function and morphology between hermaphrodites and males.

Methods

C. elegans strains were housed at 20˚C and maintained according to standard procedures (Brenner 1974). N2, dmd-10 (gk1131), and cam-1 (ks52) loss of function mutant worms were used. Young adult worms, defined as adults lacking visible eggs in the uterus, were incubated for 3 h in 1 ml of M9 buffer (KH2PO4, 22.0 mM; Na2HPO4, 42.3 mM; NaCl, 85.6 mM autoclaved, plus 1 mM sterile MgSO4) to which 5 μl of 2 mg/ml DiI (1,1-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocynanine perchlorate, Sigma #468495) was added (Shaham 2006). After washing worm suspensions with M9 twice, worms were mounted on 2% agarose pads containing 3.4 mM levamisole (Sigma #L9756). Laterally-oriented worms were imaged at 400x on an Axio Observer microscope equipped with an Apotome 2 optical sectioning device (Carl Zeiss) and illuminated with a Colibri 7 LED at 567 nm at 70% intensity for 50-60 ms. A Cy3 emission filter was used. Amphid neurons were counted after collecting 30-35 µm Z-stacks with a 0.4 µM interval using an Orca-4 camera (Hamamatsu). Orthogonal projections of left and right amphid neurons were created for display.

Reagents

Strain Genotype Available from
N2 Caenorhabditis elegans CGC
VC2341 dmd-10 (gk1131) V CGC
FK163 cam-1 (ks52) II CGC

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Annette McGehee for critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Simmons University Faculty-Student Collaborative Fellowship awarded to E.S.L and I.N. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

References

  1. Bargmann CI. Chemosensation in C. elegans. WormBook. 2006 Oct 25;:1–29. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May 01;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao J, Packer JS, Ramani V, Cusanovich DA, Huynh C, Daza R, Qiu X, Lee C, Furlan SN, Steemers FJ, Adey A, Waterston RH, Trapnell C, Shendure J. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science. 2017 Aug 18;357(6352):661–667. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collet J, Spike CA, Lundquist EA, Shaw JE, Herman RK. Analysis of osm-6, a gene that affects sensory cilium structure and sensory neuron function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1998 Jan 01;148(1):187–200. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durbeck J, Breton C, Suter M, Luth ES, McGehee AM. The Doublesex/Mab-3 domain transcription factor DMD-10 regulates ASH-dependent behavioral responses. PeerJ. 2021 Feb 25;9:e10892–e10892. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ezcurra M, Tanizawa Y, Swoboda P, Schafer WR. Food sensitizes C. elegans avoidance behaviours through acute dopamine signalling. EMBO J. 2011 Feb 01;30(6):1110–1122. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaplan JM, Horvitz HR. A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 15;90(6):2227–2231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koga M, Take-uchi M, Tameishi T, Ohshima Y. Control of DAF-7 TGF-(alpha) expression and neuronal process development by a receptor tyrosine kinase KIN-8 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1999 Dec 01;126(23):5387–5398. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.23.5387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindsay TH, Thiele TR, Lockery SR. Optogenetic analysis of synaptic transmission in the central nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2011;2:306–306. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oren-Suissa M, Bayer EA, Hobert O. Sex-specific pruning of neuronal synapses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2016 May 01;533(7602):206–211. doi: 10.1038/nature17977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Packer JS, Zhu Q, Huynh C, Sivaramakrishnan P, Preston E, Dueck H, Stefanik D, Tan K, Trapnell C, Kim J, Waterston RH, Murray JI. A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science. 2019 Sep 01;365(6459) doi: 10.1126/science.aax1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saulnier A, Keruzore M, De Clercq S, Bar I, Moers V, Magnani D, Walcher T, Filippis C, Kricha S, Parlier D, Viviani L, Matson CK, Nakagawa Y, Theil T, Götz M, Mallamaci A, Marine JC, Zarkower D, Bellefroid EJ. The doublesex homolog Dmrt5 is required for the development of the caudomedial cerebral cortex in mammals. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Aug 23;23(11):2552–2567. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schultz RD, Gumienny TL. Visualization of Caenorhabditis elegans cuticular structures using the lipophilic vital dye DiI. J Vis Exp. 2012 Jan 30;(59):e3362–e3362. doi: 10.3791/3362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Serrano-Saiz E, Oren-Suissa M, Bayer EA, Hobert O. Sexually Dimorphic Differentiation of a C. elegans Hub Neuron Is Cell Autonomously Controlled by a Conserved Transcription Factor. Curr Biol. 2017 Jan 01;27(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shaham S. 2006. WormBook: Methods in Cell Biology. WormBook, ed.
  16. Tresser J, Chiba S, Veeman M, El-Nachef D, Newman-Smith E, Horie T, Tsuda M, Smith WC. doublesex/mab3 related-1 (dmrt1) is essential for development of anterior neural plate derivatives in Ciona. Development. 2010 Jul 01;137(13):2197–2203. doi: 10.1242/dev.045302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yoshizawa A, Nakahara Y, Izawa T, Ishitani T, Tsutsumi M, Kuroiwa A, Itoh M, Kikuchi Y. Zebrafish Dmrta2 regulates neurogenesis in the telencephalon. Genes Cells. 2011 Nov 01;16(11):1097–1109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES