Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;9:663394. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.663394

TABLE 3.

AIS patients female vs. male comparisons in both IO and ISCO: Hotelling T2 tests results, 95% confidence intervals, and difference of means.

Hotelling T2 test for independent samples: female vs. male in IO and ISCO comparison
IO (n1 = 57, n2 = 75, k = 13, T2 = 51.8, p = 8.2e-5, d = 1.26, power = 0.99)
ISCO (n1 = 57, n2 = 75, k = 13, T2 = 46.5, p = 3.1e–4, d = 1.19, power = 0.99)
Parameter Descriptions Males Mean Females Mean Difference of Means CI 95% lower ÷ upper Males Mean Females Mean Difference of Means CI 95% lower ÷ upper
|ASO| (mm) |Average frontal spinal offsets| 8.1 ± 6.7 7.0 ± 4.9 1.07 −0.93 ÷ 3.07 7.3 ± 5.2 6.7 ± 4.7 0.60 −1.12 ÷ 2.31
|AGO| (mm) |Average frontal global offsets| 12.4 ± 11.5 11.3 ± 7.4 1.14 −2.13 ÷ 4.41 10.8 ± 9.8 11.0 ± 7.8 −0.20 −3.23 ÷ 2.83
CA1 (degrees) 1°Cobb angle; 15.1 ± 6.9 16.4 ± 8.1 −1.28 −3.92 ÷ 1.35 14.3 ± 7.0 15.4 ± 7.6 −1.11 −3.66 ÷ 1.44
CA2 (degrees) 2°Cobb angle 10.0 ± 5.9 12.4 ± 7.1 2.49* −4.79 ÷−0.19 10.2 ± 5.8 11.6 ± 7.2 −1.38 −3.69 ÷ 0.94
TKA (degrees) “Thoracic” Kyphosis angle 47.3 ± 8.5 43.3 ± 10.9 3.99* 0.54 ÷ 7.45 38.5 ± 10.4 35.2 ± 10.9 3.26 −0.47 ÷ 6.98
LLA (degrees) “Lumbar” Lordosis angle 39.7 ± 8.3 43.1 ± 9.5 3.36* −6.49 ÷−0.23 40.1 ± 10.0 43.3 ± 10.2 3.15* −6.66 ÷−0.36
|ΔASIS| (mm) |ΔAnterior superior iliac spine| 10.1 ± 8.2 7.8 ± 5.6 2.29 −0.10 ÷ 4.68 9.1 ± 7.1 7.7 ± 6.3 1.39 −0.92 ÷ 3.71
|ΔPSIS| (mm) |ΔPosterior superior iliac spine| 6.5 ± 4.2 5.6 ± 4.5 0.91 −0.60 ÷ 2.43 6.1 ± 3.9 5.3 ± 3.8 0.76 −0.58 ÷ 2.11
|PT| (mm) |Pelvis torsion| = | (ΔASIS-ΔPSIS)| 6.7 ± 5.6 5.0 ± 3.6 1.71* 0.13 ÷ 3.28 6.6 ± 5.1 5.5 ± 5.3 1.11 −0.69 ÷ 2.92
SA (degrees) Sacral angle 16.8 ± 5.6 18.9 ± 6.3 2.12* −4.22 ÷−0.03 18.6 ± 5.0 21.1 ± 5.9 2.49* −4.41 ÷−0.56
ASO SG (mm) Average sagittal spinal offsets −14.1 ± 12.8 −24.2 ± 12.6 10.15* 5.75 ÷ 14.56 −21.7 ± 12.6 −30.7 ± 13.4 9.02* 4.48 ÷ 13.56
AGO SG (mm) Average sagittal global offsets −10.4 ± 23.3 −2.9 ± 19.0 7.53* −14.81 ÷−0.24 −14.9 ± 24.5 −6.7 ± 19.1 8.10* −15.61 ÷−0.59
|ΔUL| (%BW) |ΔUnderfoot load| 6.3 ± 5.2 6.2 ± 3.8 0.09 −1.46 ÷ 1.64 6.9 ± 4.7 7.2 ± 4.2 −0.26 −1.81 ÷ 1.29

The * associated with bold numbers indicates the statistically significant differences of means.