TABLE 6.
Intra-subject statistical analysis comparison IO vs. ISCO posture: number of obtained for Improvement, Worsening, and Unchanged for each considered parameter reported, separately per genders, as percentages of the total AIS patients and healthy young adults.
| AIS patients males |
AIS patients females |
Healthy young adults |
||||||||
| Parameter | Descriptions | Improvement | Worsening | Unchanged | Improvement | Worsening | Unchanged | Improvement | Worsening | Unchanged |
| |ASO| | |Average frontal spinal offsets| | 24.6% | 15.8% | 59.6% | 33.3% | 22.7% | 44.0% | 29.8% | 20.7% | 49.6% |
| |AGO| | |Average frontal global offsets| | 24.6% | 15.8% | 59.6% | 14.7% | 16.0% | 69.3% | 26.4% | 30.6% | 43.0% |
| |ΔASIS| | |ΔAnterior superior iliac spine| | 35.1% | 17.5% | 47.4% | 28.0% | 18.7% | 53.3% | 19.8% | 14.0% | 66.1% |
| |ΔPSIS| | |ΔPosterior superior iliac spine| | 24.6% | 10.5% | 64.9% | 22.7% | 24.0% | 53.3% | 21.5% | 19.0% | 59.5% |
| CA1 | 1°Cobb angle | 21.1% | 12.3% | 66.7% | 33.3% | 13.3% | 53.3% | 28.1% | 23.1% | 48.8% |
| CA2 | 2°Cobb angle | 12.3% | 22.8% | 64.9% | 34.7% | 13.3% | 52.0% | 25.6% | 26.4% | 47.9% |
| |PT| | |Pelvis torsion| = |(ΔASIS-ΔPSIS)| | 29.8% | 29.8% | 40.4% | 21.3% | 32.0% | 46.7% | 29.8% | 35.5% | 34.7% |
| SA | Sacral angle | 42.1% | 17.5% | 40.4% | 25.3% | 28.0% | 46.7% | 35.5% | 5.8% | 58.7% |
| TKA | “Thoracic” Kyphosis angle | 36.8% | 36.8% | 26.3% | 29.3% | 41.3% | 29.3% | 36.4% | 27.3% | 36.4% |
| LLA | “Lumbar” Lordosis angle | 26.3% | 24.6% | 49.1% | 29.3% | 20.0% | 50.7% | 20.7% | 12.4% | 66.9% |
| |ΔUL| | |ΔUnderfoot load average| | 23.3% | 27.9% | 48.8% | 22.0% | 40.7% | 37.3% | 22.5% | 27.5% | 50.0% |
| FPI | Frontal postural index | 12.3% | 3.5% | 84.2% | 17.3% | 4.0% | 78.7% | 14.0% | 9.9% | 76.0% |
| SPI | Sagittal postural index | 19.3% | 14.0% | 66.7% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 66.7% | 27.3% | 10.7% | 62.0% |
| GPI | Global postural index | 7.0% | 5.3% | 87.7% | 4.0% | 2.7% | 93.3% | 6.6% | 6.6% | 86.8% |