Table 1.
Category | Description | Proportion |
---|---|---|
Excellent | Well-defined borders of the myocardium with good contrast. Typically, mid-ventricular slice. Easy to contour with high consistency. | 5.2% |
Good | Overall well-defined borders of the myocardium with reasonably good contrast. Requires some caution when contouring. Moderately easy to contour, but prone to higher variability than easy cases. | 23.5% |
Acceptable | Ambiguous borders of the myocardium with poor contrast. Requires caution when contouring. Prone to high variability. | 65.3% |
Poor | Ambiguous borders of the myocardium with poor contrast. Observable pathologies or artefacts. | 6.0% |