Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep 14;4(11):1118–1120. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00941-5

Figure 1. Best-performing model fits of the P1/P2 ratio as V3 is varied.

Figure 1.

Left, the original Louie et al. dataset; right, the Gluth et al. replication. IIA is represented by the dashed line. These fits are generated for the average V1 and V2 observed in each sample. In the Louie et al. dataset, Divisive Normalization with the MVN error captures a u-shaped non-monotonic pattern in the P1/P2 ratio. In the Gluth et al. dataset, Divisive Normalization with the Gumbel error captures a decreasing pattern. Overall, both datasets show evidence for normalization but differ in the specific pattern of context-dependence, suggesting subtle differences in the choice data.