Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 15.

Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep 14;4(11):1118–1120. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00941-5

Table 1:

Maximum likelihood estimates for the Gluth et al. replication dataset, pooled over subjects. Standard errors are in parentheses

	No Normalization			Divisive Normalization
f(ε)	Gumbel	N	MVN	Gumbel	N	MVN
σ	1.072	1.064	.994	.927	.794	.783
	(.012)	(.011)	(.016)	(.051)	(.046)	(.044)
ω	0	0	0	.018	.033	.027
				(.006)	(.006)	(.006)
C₁			.547			.556
			(.038)			(.039)
C₂			.957			.942
			(.019)			(.018)

LL	−16727	−16917	−16898	−16723	−16900	−16886
p-value on X²(1) test for ω > 0				.0041	.0000	.0000
AIC	33456	33836	33802	33450	33804	33780