Table 3:
Correlation between with LV/RV haemodynamics and surgical repair
| Beta ± SE | R-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LV-EF (%) | −2.78 ± 1.00 | −0.45 | 0.009 |
| LV-EDVi (ml/m2) | 2.81 ± 2.99 | 0.15 | 0.354 |
| LV-ESVi (ml/m2) | 4.15 ± 1.54 | 0.40 | 0.010 |
| LV-SV (ml) | −0.85 ± 1.89 | −0.07 | 0.655 |
| LV-CI (l/min/m2) | −0.069 ± 0.152 | −0.08 | 0.654 |
| RV-EDVi (ml/m2) | 11.0 ± 6.14 | 0.28 | 0.080 |
| RV-ESVi (ml/m2) | 9.67 ± 4.39 | 0.37 | 0.034 |
| RV-EF (%) | −2.58 ± 1.50 | −0.26 | 0.091 |
| RF (%) | −0.88 ± 3.64 | −0.04 | 0.809 |
| Aortic size (cm) | −0.07 ± 0.11 | −0.10 | 0.534 |
| Age at repair (months) | −0.17 ± 0.23 | −0.12 | 0.475 |
Data are reported as beta coefficients representing the best fit values from the linear regression ± standard error, Pearson R-value and respective P-value. values were natural log transformed for the correlation analyses.
CI: cardiac index; EDVi: indexed end-diastolic volume; EF: ejection fraction; ESVi: indexed end-systolic volume; LV: left ventricle; RF: pulmonary regurgitation fraction; RV: right ventricle; SV: stroke volume.