Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chemosphere. 2021 Mar 29;278:130415. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130415

Table 1.

Comparison of K′da and Kpa values in the literature with this studya

Chemical logKOA K′da (m3/g) Kda (dimensionless) Kpa (m3/g) Reference
TCEP 7.6 8.5 8.0 × 106 70.6 Zhang et al, 2016 (EPI Suite value)
7.0 2.1 2.0 × 106 17.7 Zhang et al, 2016 (SPARC value)
8.9 169.4 1.6 × 108 1.4 × 103 Zhang et al, 2016 (Absolv value)
8.0b 22.6 2.1 × 107 188.3 EC, 2009
85.5 6.3 × 107 711.0 This study - ATD on PIR foam
20.75 2.0 × 107 172.6 This study - Average of HD2 on PIR
5.21 4.9 × 106 43.3 This study - HD2 on dry alkyl paint
TCPP 8.5 67.4 6.3 × 107 561.0 Zhang et al, 2016 (EPI Suite value)
7.6 8.5 8.0 × 106 70.6 Zhang et al, 2016 (SPARC value)
10.0 2.1 × 103 2.0 × 109 1.8 × 104 Zhang et al, 2016 (Absolv value)
7.2b 3.6 3.4 × 106 30.0 EC, 2008a
29 Liagkouridis et al., 2017 (7-day’s
224.4 1.6 × 108 1.9 × 103 This study- ATD on PIR foam
14.8 1.4 × 107 122.9 This study - Average of HD2 on PIR
3.4 3.2 × 106 28.5 This study - HD2 on alkyl paint
TDCPP 10.6 8.5 × 103 8.0 × 109 7.1 × 104 Zhang et al, 2016 (EPI Suite value)
10.8 1.4 × 104 1.3 × 1010 1.1 × 105 Zhang et al, 2016 (SPARC value)
13.0 2.1 × 106 2.0 × 1012 1.8 × 107 Zhang et al, 2016 (Absolv value)
7.9b 15.72 1.5 × 107 130.8 EC, 2008b
13.7 1.0 × 107 114.1 This study- ATD on PIR foam
273.8 2.6 × 108 2.3 × 103 This study - Average of HD2 on PIR
42.8 4.0 × 107 355.8 This study - HD2 on alkyl paint
a.

Unless otherwise noted, for all literature data in this table, logKOA data was from the cited literature; K’da was calculated using Equation (4) with HD2 data fom = 0.2, ρ = 0.938 g/m3; Kda was calculated using Equation (2); K pa was calculated using Equation (6).

b.

KOA was calculated using Equation (5) at T = 25°C (298K) with Kow and H data from European Union risk assessment reports.