Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cross Cult Res. 2018 May 16;53(1):87–115. doi: 10.1177/1069397118774504

Table 3:

Results of general linear models testing the Interviewer Effects Hypotheses by estimating the influence of objective interviewer and respondent characteristics on acquiescence

Dependent Variable: Mean ARS Model 3: Interviewer Experience in Years (n=308) Model 4: Interviewer Experience Index (n=308)
Interviewer acculturation (more EA = 0):
 Low bicultural −0.15 (.10) −0.15 (.10)
 High bicultural 0.01 (.08) 0.01 (.08)
 More Latino −0.03 (.10) −0.01 (.10)
Interviewer age −0.001 (.004) −0.002 (.004)
Interviewer education (high school = 0):
 Some college or technical/vocational school −0.01 (.08) −0.02 (.08)
 4-year college degree −0.03 (.09) −0.05 (.08)
 Graduate degree −0.01 (.18) −0.02 (.17)
Interviewer gender (male = 0) −0.001 (.07) −0.01 (.06)
Interviewer experience in years −0.001 (.02)
Interviewer experience index 0.01 (.01)
Respondent age 0.01 (.001)*** 0.01 (.001)***
Respondent education (less than 7th grade = 0):
 7th through 12th grade, no diploma −0.07 (.09) −0.07 (.09)
 High school graduate or equivalent −0.18 (.09)* −0.18 (.09)*
 Some college or technical/vocational school −0.32 (.09)*** −0.32 (.09)***
 4-year college degree −0.41 (.09)**** −0.41 (.09)****
 Graduate degree −0.44 (.10)**** −0.43 (.10)****
Respondent gender (male = 0) 0.09 (.05)# 0.09 (.05)#
Respondent ethnicity (EA = 0):
 Mexican American 0.29 (.07)**** 0.28 (.07)****
 Puerto Rican 0.29 (.06)**** 0.28 (.06)****
 Cuban American 0.38 (.06)**** 0.38 (.06)****
R2 .38 .38
Model p-value <.0001 <.0001
#

= p < .10

*

= p < .05

**

= p < .01

***

= p < .001

****

= p < .0001