Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cross Cult Res. 2018 May 16;53(1):87–115. doi: 10.1177/1069397118774504

Table 5:

Results of general linear models estimating the influence of language use on acquiescence, Latino respondents only

Dependent Variable: Mean ARS Model 8: Language Use Hypothesis #1 (n=295) Model 9: Language Use Hypothesis #2 (n=280)
Interview language (English = 0) 0.21 (.08)**
First language learned as a child (English = 0)
Interview language x first language learned as a child (English interview/ English learned first = 0):
 English interview/Spanish learned first 0.10 (.09)
 Spanish interview/English learned first 0.23 (.21)
 Spanish interview/Spanish learned first 0.28 (.10)**
Respondent acculturation (more EA = 0):
 Low bicultural 0.02 (.09) 0.05 (.10)
 High bicultural 0.19 (.08)* 0.19 (.09)*
 More Latino 0.03 (.09) 0.03 (.10)
Respondent age 0.003 (.001)* 0.003 (.002)*
Respondent education (less than 7th grade = 0):
 7th through 12th grade, no diploma 0.002 (.08) 0.003 (.08)
 High school graduate or equivalent −0.13 (.08) −0.12 (.08)
 Some college or technical/vocational school −0.25 (.08)** −0.24 (.08)**
 4-year college degree −0.39 (.09)**** −0.39 (.09)****
 Graduate degree −0.43 (.11)*** −0.45 (.11)****
Respondent gender (male = 0) 0.08 (.05) 0.08 (.05)
Respondent ethnicity (Cuban American = 0):
 Mexican American −0.11 (.06)# −0.11 (.06)#
 Puerto Rican −0.11 (.05)* −0.12 (.06)*
R2 .31 .31
Model p-value <.0001 <.0001
#

= p < .10

*

= p < .05

**

= p < .01

***

= p < .001

****

= p < .0001