Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2021 May 12;165:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105292

Figure 5. Fasting glucose and choice in humans.

Figure 5.

Mean proportion of larger-later (LL) choices for each group as a function of fasting glucose and delay (A) and magnitude (B) ratio in humans. Sensitivity to delay and magnitude increased from lower to higher fasting glucose levels for the control group. However, sensitivity to delay and magnitude did not change significantly from lower to higher fasting glucose levels for the high-fat group. The delay and magnitude ratios were the SS / LL delay or magnitude, respectively. Smaller ratios indicate a larger difference in the delays or magnitudes. HF = high-fat; C = control; FG = fasting glucose. Error bars (+/− SEM) were computed with respect to the estimated marginal means of the fitted generalized linear mixed-effects model.