Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;13:144. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00667-7

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

3D representations of the RL of (a) GCA–M0.2–5, (b) GCA–M0.2–10, (c) GCA–M0.2–20, (d) GCA–M0.3–5, (e) GCA–M0.3–10, and (f) GCA–M0.3–20. (g) Maximum EABs of the GCA–M0.2–10 and GCA–M0.3–10 aerogels. (h, i) RLmin and EAB values of as-obtained samples with different thicknesses, respectively. (j, k) Comparison of specific RL and specific EAB values of recently reported carbon-based aerogels in X- and Ku-band