Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;20:59. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01485-x

Table 3.

Effect size of NAFLD on incident diabetes in prespecified and exploratory subgroups

Characteristic No. of participants HR (95% CI) P value P for interaction
Gender 0.2386
 Male 2048 2.04 (1.32, 3.15) 0.0013
 Female 246 4.34 (0.29, 64.28) 0.2853
BMI (kg/m2) 0.1157
  < 25 1538 1.59 (0.87, 2.92) 0.1353
  ≥ 25 662 3.40 (1.61, 7.17) 0.0013
Visceral fat obesity 0.0688
 NO 1996 1.67 (1.02, 2.73) 0.0410
 YES 272 4.75 (1.49, 15.11) 0.0083
FPG (mg/dL) 0.2901
 Low 758 5.31 (0.64, 44.16) 0.1221
 High 1056 1.88 (1.12, 3.15) 0.0172
HbA1c (%) 0.2688
 Low 494 11.99 (0.87, 164.39) 0.0629
 High 1258 1.95 (1.20, 3.20) 0.0076
TC (mg/dL) 0.9720
 Low 834 3.01 (1.33, 6.79) 0.0081
 High 852 2.82 (1.32, 6.04) 0.0076
TG (mg/dL) 0.1982
 Low 914 1.98 (0.76, 5.13) 0.1607
 High 938 4.10 (2.16, 7.77) < 0.0001
HDL-C (mg/dL) 0.8977
 Low 892 1.96 (1.11, 3.46) 0.0197
 High 916 2.07 (0.86, 4.97) 0.1039
ALT (U/L) 0.0611
 Low 948 1.19 (0.55, 2.56) 0.6603
 High 968 2.82 (1.52, 5.25) 0.0011
AST (U/L) 0.2397
 Low 882 1.39 (0.63, 3.07) 0.4144
 High 902 2.65 (1.32, 5.32) 0.0060
GGT (U/L) 0.2994
 Low 880 1.97 (0.82, 4.73) 0.1294
 High 900 3.37 (1.80, 6.33) 0.0002
Propensity score 0.3788
 Low 1086 1.16 (0.36, 3.74) 0.8042
 Medium 1060 1.73 (0.88, 3.41) 0.1095
 High 1088 2.71 (1.68, 4.39) < 0.0001

Note 1: The above model has been adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, GGT, HbA1c, FPG, TC, TG, HDL-C

Note 2 In each case, the model was not adjusted for the stratification variable