Table 4.
Association between NAFLD and incident diabetes in different models of the original and the weighted cohort
Variable (A) | Non-adjusted | Model I (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model II (HR, 95% CI, P) |
Non-NAFLD | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
NAFLD | 8.07 (6.44, 10.11) < 0.0001 | 3.79 (2.88, 4.98) < 0.0001 | 2.17 (1.63, 2.88) < 0.0001 |
Variable (B) | Non-adjusted | Model I (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model II (HR, 95% CI, P) |
Non-NAFLD | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
NAFLD | 2.72 (2.31, 3.21) < 0.0001 | 2.61 (2.21, 3.08) < 0.0001 | 2.27 (1.91, 2.69) < 0.0001 |
A In the original cohort; B In the weighted cohort
Crude model: we did not adjust for other covariates
Model I: we adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP
Model II: we adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, GGT, HbA1c, FPG, TC, TG, HDL-C
HR Hazard ratios, CI Confidence interval, Ref Reference