Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;20:59. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01485-x

Table 4.

Association between NAFLD and incident diabetes in different models of the original and the weighted cohort

Variable (A) Non-adjusted Model I (HR, 95% CI, P) Model II (HR, 95% CI, P)
Non-NAFLD Ref. Ref. Ref.
NAFLD 8.07 (6.44, 10.11) < 0.0001 3.79 (2.88, 4.98) < 0.0001 2.17 (1.63, 2.88) < 0.0001
Variable (B) Non-adjusted Model I (HR, 95% CI, P) Model II (HR, 95% CI, P)
Non-NAFLD Ref. Ref. Ref.
NAFLD 2.72 (2.31, 3.21) < 0.0001 2.61 (2.21, 3.08) < 0.0001 2.27 (1.91, 2.69) < 0.0001

A In the original cohort; B In the weighted cohort

Crude model: we did not adjust for other covariates

Model I: we adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP

Model II: we adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, GGT, HbA1c, FPG, TC, TG, HDL-C

HR Hazard ratios, CI Confidence interval, Ref Reference