Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Imaging. 2020 Aug 27;68:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.07.026

Table 2.

Calcium scores, MPI, and hemodynamics results for baseline and follow-up scans for each patients analyzed. “1” = baseline and “2” = follow-up.

Patient# CA1 CA2 MPI1 MPI2 LVEF1 LVEF2 SMBF1 RMBF1 SMBF2 RMBF2 MFR 1 MFR 2
1 0 0 NL NL > 60 > 60 2.97 0.76 3.23 0.85 3.89 3.79
2 0 0 NL ABNL > 60 > 60 0.804 0.36 1.40 0.60 2.22 2.35
3 0 1 NL NL > 60 > 60 2.646 0.71 2.94 0.77 3.75 3.83
4 0 0 NL ABNL 52/56 50/55 2.654 0.92 1.97 0.83 2.88 2.37
5 4 14 NL NL > 60 > 60 2.482 0.71 3.17 0.72 3.52 4.41
6 3 12 NL NL > 60 > 60 3.056 1.01 2.73 0.98 3.04 2.77
7 NA NA NL NL > 60 > 60 1.762 0.99 3.19 1.04 1.78 3.07
8 1 1 NL ABNL > 60 > 60 3.13 1.17 3.45 1.57 2.66 2.20

CA: calcium score. MPI: myocardium perfusion imaging visual assessment. (1) and (2): baseline and follow up respectively. LVEF: left ventricle ejection fraction. RMBF: rest myocardial blood flow. SMBF: stress myocardial blood flow. MFR: myocardium flow reserve. NL: normal. ABNL: abnormal.