Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;16(6):e0252575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252575

Table 1. Comparison of culture systems.

Name Type Classification Vendor V (mL) SA (cm2) SA:V Cell type SC/mL x106 SC/cm2 x104 Total SCs x106 Td (hr-1) Shear (dyne cm-2) Source
Packed Bed PDMS Matrix Immobilized - 110 2,800 25.5 hP-MSC 0.509 2.00 56 30.2 1–5 [19]
Quantum Hollow Fiber Immobilized TERUMOBCT 1,440 21,000 14.6 hAd-MSC 0.167 1.14 240 34.1 0.3–0.7 [2023]
Mobius STBR Suspension Millipore Sigma 50,000 300,000 6 hBM-MSC 2.00 1.67 5,000 54.0 2–40 [21,24,25]
Appliflex Wave Bag Suspension Applikon 1,500 7,360 4.91 hAd-MSC 0.190 3.87 285 31.2 0.1–0.5 [6,26]
Mag 3 Paddle Suspension PBS 3,000 - - hBM-MSC 1.90 - 5,700 63.0 - [27]
Xpansion Multiplate Parallel Plate Immobilized Pall 1600 6,120 3.83 hAd-MSC 0.111 5.4 334 34.1 0.1 [28,29]
iCellis Random Fiber Matrix Immobilized Pall 1000–5000 40,000 40 hBM-MSC 2.93 16 - 67.2 1–5 [25,30,31]
Novel System Lattice Immobilized - 20 122 6.1 hBM-MSC 0.2 2 1.8 82 0.0029 -

Abbreviations: Volume (V), SA Surface Area (SA), Stem Cells (SC), Doubling Time (Td), Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC), Human Bone Marrow (hBM), Human Adipose Derived (hAd), Human Placental (hP).

Volume, available surfaces areas, cell types used, total stem cell yield normalized to volume and surface area, total overall yield, doubling time, and reported shear stress of various bioreactors for MSC culture.