Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;106(7):2057–2076. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab106

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

PLA PP
(n = 9) (n = 9)
Sex M = 6, F = 3 M = 5, F = 4
Age (y) 22 ± 1 23 ± 2
Body mass (kg) 78 ± 4 69 ± 4
Height (cm) 176 ± 1 173 ± 3
BMI (kg·m-2) 25 ± 1 23 ± 1
Total eccentric work (J·kg-1) 642 ± 43 574 ± 44
Habitual protein (g·kgBM-1·day-1) 1.1 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.2
Controlled protein (excluding condition) (g·kgBM-1·day-1) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1
Controlled protein (including condition) (g·kgBM-1·day-1) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1a

Values represent mean ± SEM. Total eccentric work represents the total volume of eccentric work performed during the unilateral eccentric exercise protocol on day 7 of the experimental period normalized for body mass. Habitual protein represents participants 3-day average habitual protein intake obtained from a food diary. Controlled protein represents the 14-day average protein intake provided by the dietary control. Comparisons between PLA and PP were performed with separate unpaired t-tests.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F = female; M = male; NS, nonsignificant (P > 0.05); PLA, placebo; PP, protein-polyphenol; y, years.

aDifference in controlled protein intake (including condition) between PLA and PP.