Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;37(10):1444–1451. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa971

Table 2.

Performance at different taxonomic levels

OTU latent space
Combined latent space
Taxonomic
level
No.
OTUs
Pearson Bray–Curtis Pearson Bray–Curtis
Phylum 16 0.9576 0.1591 0.9451 0.1833
Class 45 0.8777 0.2514 0.8646 0.2610
Order 83 0.8264 0.3007 0.7983 0.3057
Family 144 0.8229 0.3239 0.7965 0.3229
Genus 222 0.8133 0.3414 0.7901 0.3408
Species 717 0.7348 0.4181 0.7220 0.4072

Note: Based on reference model configuration, with the three selected input variables.