Table 8.
Comparison of the performance of our proposed system with previous studies.
Previous studies | Accuracy % | Precision % | Recall % | F1-score % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hore et al. [29] | 92.54 | 85.71 | 96 | 90.56 |
Vasquez-Morales et al. [11] | 92 | 93 | 90 | 91 |
Rady and Anwar [13] | 95.84 | 84.06 | 93.55 | 88.55 |
Elhoseny et al. [19] | 85 | 88 | 88 | |
Ogunleye and Wang [30] | 96.8 | 87 | 93 | |
Khan et al. [31] | 95.75 | 96.2 | 95.8 | 95.8 |
Chittora et al. [32] | 90.73 | 83.34 | 93 | 88.05 |
Jongbo et al. [33] | 89.2 | 97.72 | 97.8 | |
Harimoorthy and Thangavelu [34] | 66.3 | 65.9 | 65.9 | |
Proposed model (random forest) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Proposed model (decision tree) | 99.34 | 98.68 | 100 | 99.17 |
Proposed model (KNN) | 98.33 | 100 | 97.37 | 98.67 |
Proposed model (SVM) | 97.3 | 94.74 | 92 | 96.67 |