Table 2.
Controla |
IMPACT Videoa |
Comparison of Video and Controlb |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure | Mean (SD) | 95% CI | Effect sizec | Mean (SD) | 95% CI | Effect sizec | Difference in Mean Change (95% CI) | p-value | Effectsizec | |
In the next 3 months, I intend to discuss CTs with patients | Pre | 4.27 (1.86) | 4.35 (1.85) | |||||||
Post | 5.17 (1.49) | 5.66 (1.38) | ||||||||
Change | 0.89 (1.51) | (0.79, 1.00) | 0.47 | 1.31 (1.66) | (1.18, 1.43) | 0.72 | 0.46 (0.34, 0.58) | <.0001 | 0.25 | |
Total Intention Score | Pre | 10.14 (8.36) | 10.15 (8.27) | |||||||
Post | 14.28 (8.94) | 17.14 (8.44) | ||||||||
Change | 4.14 (6.10) | (3.70, 4.59) | 0.50 | 6.86 (7.53) | (6.27, 7.44) | 0.83 | 2.79 (2.11, 3.47) | <.0001 | 0.34 | |
Knowledge Score | Pre | 14.80 (3.05) | 14.77 (3.18) | |||||||
Post | 17.63 (2.25) | 17.33 (2.32) | ||||||||
Change | 2.81 (3.01) | (2.59, 3.03) | 0.90 | 2.56 (3.13) | (2.32, 2.79) | 0.81 | −0.30 (−0.52, −0.08) | 0.007 | −0.10 | |
Attitude Score | Pre | 101.7 (15.1) | 102.5 (16.1) | |||||||
Post | 108.7 (15.1) | 115.9 (16.1) | ||||||||
Change | 6.9 (12.0) | (6.0, 7.8) | 0.43 | 13.3 (14.8) | (12.2, 14.4) | 0.86 | 6.7 (5.5,8.0) | <.0001 | 0.43 | |
Indirect Subjective Norms Score | Pre | 144.6 (64.5) | 149.6 (67.2) | |||||||
Post | 160.4 (69.0) | 176.8 (67.5) | ||||||||
Change | 15.9 (40.8) | (12.9, 18.9) | 0.23 | 27.7 (48.3) | (24.1, 31.4) | 0.43 | 13.0 (8.5, 17.6) | <.0001 | 0.20 | |
Direct Perceived Behavioral Control Score | Pre | 17.49 (5.31) | 17.22 (5.33) | |||||||
Post | 19.62 (4.65) | 21.26 (4.34) | ||||||||
Change | 2.09 (3.60) | (1.82, 2.35) | 0.41 | 4.03 (4.59) | (3.69, 4.38) | 0.74 | 1.80 (1.44, 2.16) | <.0001 | 0.34 | |
Indirect Perceived Behavioral Control Score | Pre | 151.9 (63.2) | 156.9 (65.6) | |||||||
Post | 187.1 (59.7) | 203.0 (60.4) | ||||||||
Change | 35.6 (43.4) | (32.4, 38.8) | 0.54 | 46.3 (51.3) | (42.4, 50.2) | 0.73 | 12.8 (8.3, 17.2) | <.0001 | 0.20 |
Control group N = 716–788 due to missing values; Video group N = 673–690 due to missing values.
Comparison of video and control is from an analysis of covariance adjusting for age, race, nursing education, CTs available at work, years of oncology nursing, primary work setting (academic/non-academic), primary work setting2 (Inpatients/Outpatients), and baseline score of measure.
Effect sizes calculated as adjusted mean or difference in adjusted means from analysis of covariance, divided by baseline standard deviation of measure.