Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;10(12):3873–3885. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3929

TABLE 2.

Comparison between early resistance and non‐early resistance to osimertinib

Early resistance

(n = 6) a

Non‐early resistance

(n = 42) a

p
70.5 (58–81) 71.0 (57–85) 0.943
Sex
Female 6 (17%) 29 (83%) 0.108
Male 0 13 (100%)
Smoking status
Never smoker 6 (17%) 30 (83%) 0.318
Ex or current smoker 0 12 (100%)
Stage
0 7 (100%) 0.578
Ⅳ or recurrence 6 (15%) 35 (85%)
Extrathoracic metastasis
Present 5 (19%) 21 (81%) 0.195
Absent 1 (5%) 21 (95%)
EGFR activating mutation
Ex19 del 0 23 (100%) 0.010
L858R 6 (24%) 19 (76%)
T790 M AF, median (range) 0.055 (0–45.78) 0.019 (0–22.5) 0.384
T790 M AF/Total AF, median (range) 0.355 (0–0.227) 0.08 (0–0.414) 0.704
TP53 SNV
Present 5 (19%) 21 (81%) 0.199
Absent 1 (5%) 21 (95%)
SNV/Indel plus CNV, median (range) 7 (2–9) 3 (0–8) 0.025

Abbreviations: AF, allele fraction; CNV, copy number variants; SNV/Indel, single‐nucleotide variants and/or insertion/deletions.

a

Six patients, out of 54 among whom NGS was technically successful, were excluded from the analysis because of discontinuation due to adverse effects or patient's request. Patient characteristics in early resistance and non‐early resistance were compared with the χ2 test for categorical data and the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data.