TABLE 4:
Feature, Reader | Accelerated | Clinical | Difference | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Artifacts | ||||
1 | 2.02 ± 0.14 | 2.04 ± 0.19 | 0.02 ± 0.19 | 0.465 |
2 | 2.34 ± 0.69 | 2.35 ± 0.62 | 0.01 ± 0.69 | 0.869 |
3 | 2.05 ± 0.21 | 2.05 ± 0.21 | 0.00 ± 0.19 | 1.000 |
4 | 2.20 ± 0.40 | 2.21 ± 0.41 | 0.01 ± 0.44 | 0.862 |
5 | 2.04 ± 0.64 | 2.10 ± 0.59 | 0.06 ± 0.78 | 0.441 |
6 | 2.10 ± 0.33 | 2.10 ± 0.30 | 0.00 ± 0.41 | 1.000 |
Signal-to-noise ratio | ||||
1 | 1.01 ± 0.10 | 1.49 ± 0.59 | 0.48 ± 0.59 | < 0.001 |
2 | 1.98 ± 0.96 | 2.13 ± 0.81 | 0.15 ± 0.95 | 0.139 |
3 | 1.06 ± 0.23 | 1.15 ± 0.36 | 0.09 ± 0.42 | 0.052 |
4 | 1.12 ± 0.33 | 1.66 ± 0.58 | 0.54 ± 0.62 | < 0.001 |
5 | 1.06 ± 0.23 | 1.36 ± 0.48 | 0.31 ± 0.50 | < 0.001 |
6 | 1.31 ± 0.55 | 1.81 ± 0.59 | 0.50 ± 0.66 | < 0.001 |
Sharpness | ||||
1 | 1.21 ± 0.53 | 1.31 ± 0.62 | 0.09 ± 0.54 | 0.110 |
2 | 2.06 ± 0.94 | 2.19 ± 0.83 | 0.13 ± 0.98 | 0.219 |
3 | 1.12 ± 0.40 | 1.14 ± 0.40 | 0.02 ± 0.45 | 0.737 |
4 | 1.75 ± 0.57 | 1.41 ± 0.58 | −0.34 ± 0.69 | < 0.001 |
5 | 1.20 ± 0.49 | 1.39 ± 0.54 | 0.19 ± 0.66 | 0.012 |
6 | 1.46 ± 0.70 | 1.78 ± 0.70 | 0.31 ± 0.80 | < 0.001 |
Overall image quality | ||||
1 | 1.16 ± 0.44 | 1.34 ± 0.61 | 0.19 ± 0.51 | 0.001 |
2 | 2.06 ± 0.92 | 2.22 ± 0.81 | 0.16 ± 0.93 | 0.095 |
3 | 1.10 ± 0.33 | 1.13 ± 0.36 | 0.03 ± 0.42 | 0.560 |
4 | 1.75 ± 0.64 | 1.94 ± 0.69 | 0.19 ± 0.70 | 0.019 |
5 | 1.25 ± 0.58 | 1.43 ± 0.63 | 0.18 ± 0.71 | 0.025 |
6 | 1.50 ± 0.68 | 1.95 ± 0.68 | 0.45 ± 0.78 | < 0.001 |
Note—Except for p values, data are mean ± SD. Image quality was rated on a 4-point scale, with 1 being the best quality and 4 being the worst.