Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;21:183. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02253-8

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Structural comparison between L. paracasei LP10266 and five closely related strains (L. casei LC2W, L. casei LOCK919, L. paracasei N1115, L. paracasei TK1501, and L. paracasei TMW1.1434) at the genomic level. The rings (from outside to inside) represent CDS annotations on the positive strand, ORFs on the positive and negative strands, and CDS annotations on the negative strand, respectively. The red rings (from outside to inside) represent the BLAST results of L. paracasei TMW1.1434 (CP016355), L. paracasei TK1501 (CP017716), L. casei LC2W (CP002616), L. casei LOCK919 (CP005486), and L. paracasei N1115 (CP007122). The blue lines framed the prophage sequences at the nucleotide positions 575–618 and 1183–1227, respectively