Table 3.

Median $\pm$ MAD of the reproducibility of the spatial maps obtained by canonical HMF and sICA. The best approach is in bold, the superscript ${}^{†}$ represents statistically significant better/worse results when compared to sICA (p-value$<0.05$).

		Motor						Incidental Memory			Glass
		Foot	Left Hand	Right Hand	Tongue	Block	Cues	Faces	Scenes	Words	Spatial	Verbal
Spatial Repr.	Canonical HMF	0.92$\pm$0.05${}^{†}$	0.95$\pm$0.07${}^{†}$	0.95$\pm$0.17	0.97$\pm$0.01${}^{†}$	0.81$\pm$0.17${}^{†}$	0.89$\pm$0.12	0.91$\pm$0.09${}^{†}$	0.94$\pm$0.03${}^{†}$	0.90$\pm$0.22${}^{†}$	0.92$\pm$0.12${}^{†}$	0.86$\pm$0.12
	sICA	0.65$\pm$0.13	0.89$\pm$0.06	0.87$\pm$0.22	0.90$\pm$0.09	0.58$\pm$0.2	0.79$\pm$0.19	0.81$\pm$0.02	0.84$\pm$0.06	0.78$\pm$0.04	0.82$\pm$0.02	0.79$\pm$0.06