TABLE 1.
Summary statistics for sequence coverage, inbreeding coefficients (F), per‐site Watterson's theta (θ w), heterozygosity (H), and effective population sizes (N e) for Montezuma quail populations analyzed in this study
| N | Sequence depth (X) (mean ±SD) | Sequence breadth (%) (mean ±SD) | F (mean ±SD) | Whole genome | Genic regions | N e (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| θ W | H | θ W | H | ||||||
| Arizona | 52 | 2.14 ± 0.78 | 69.45 ± 14.51 | 0.05 ± 0.08 | 5.37 × 10−4 | 0.0014 | 5.23 × 10−4 | 0.0012 | 42,795 (42,764–42,825) |
| Texas | 15 | 1.45 ± 1.82 | 42.69 ± 30.17 | 0.33 ± 0.28 | 4.05 × 10−4 | 0.0009 | 3.94 × 10−4 | 0.0007 | 32,208 (32,182–32,234) |
| New Mexico | 7 | 3.48 ± 1.78 | 84.16 ± 11.51 | 0.07 ± 0.08 | 5.57 × 10−4 | 0.0013 | 4.47 × 10−4 | 0.0011 | 36,417 (36,390–36,446) |
The diversity indices were calculated for either the whole genome or just the genic regions. Long‐term (evolutionary) N e was calculated using an estimated mutation rate of 3.14 × 10−9 with 95% CI calculated using standard error in θ w estimates. Sequence depth is measured in fold coverage, and breadth is measured as percentage of Montezuma quail assembly mapped by the reads.