Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;57(3):333–340. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit235

Table 4.

Performance of European and US Second-Tier Immunoblot Assays

No. Positive (%)
European IgM IBa European IgG IBa European IgM or IgG IBa US IgM IBb US IgG IBb US IgM or IgG IBb
Patients with Lyme borreliosis acquired in Europe (n = 64) 34 (53) 43 (67) 52 (81) 16 (25) 32 (50) 37 (58) [.007]
 Erythema migrans (n = 20) 7 (35) 7 (35) 11 (55) 2 (10) 2 (10) 4 (20) [.05]
 Lyme neuroborreliosis (n = 15) 12 (80) 9 (60) 13 (87) 6 (40) 6 (40) 8 (53) [.11]
 Lyme arthritis (n = 15) 10 (67) 13 (87) 14 (93) 4 (27) 10 (67) 11 (73) [0.33]
 Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (n = 14) 5 (36) 14 (100) 14 (100) 4 (29) 14 (100) 14 (100) [1.00]
Healthy control subjects from nonendemic area (n = 100) 9 (9) 0 (0) 9 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) [.003]

Bracketed numbers represent the P values for the comparison with combined results obtained using European IgM and IgG immunoblots.

Abbreviations: IB, immunoblot; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M.

a Interpreted according to European “MiQ 12 plus VlsE” criteria (Table 2) [40].

b Interpreted according to standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria (Table 2) [15], except that duration of illness was not considered.