Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2020 Nov 26;12(5):1041–1062. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01561-w

Table 4.

Exploratory sub-analysis to evaluate pooled effect estimates by control-type, MBI-type, and population-type (clinical versus non-clinical).

RVE Exploratory Sub-Analysis k (N ds) ES (d) 95% CI df p-value Tau2
MBI vs Inactive Control
MBSR
  Clinical 16 (119) 0.54 (0.27, 0.81) 15 0.0007 0.27
  Non-clinical 7 (44) 0.31 (0.13, 0.48) 5 0.0060 0.04
MBCT
  Clinical 10 (52) 0.66 (0.43, 0.90) 8 0.0002 0.10
  Non-clinical 2 (9) 1.91 (−1.73, 5.57) 1 * 0.36
MBI vs Active Control
MBSR
  Clinical 11 (87) 0.06 (−0.11, 0.24) 10 0.4460 0.19
  Non-clinical 3 (17) 0.14 (−0.93, 1.20) 2 * 0.88
MBCT
  Clinical 5 (36) 0.00 (−0.49, 0.50) 4 * 0.38
  Non-clinical 1 (2) -- -- -- -- --

Note. Effects in boldface reach statistical significance.

*

df is less than 4, which makes p-value untrustworthy (Tanner-Smith and Tipton, 2014).

CI, Confidence interval; d, Effect size (standardized mean difference, where positive values imply improvement; df, degrees of freedom; k, Number of studies; RVE, Robust variance estimation;