Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2021 Mar 15;86(2):926–934. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28747

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Evolution of gradient waveforms (a) and gradient moments. (b) For a y-rotational motion with constant angular velocity of ωr = 13°/s (no acceleration) relative to the stationary diffusion gradient in z-direction (Δθ), the spins experience an effective x-gradient (ΔGx) that continues to increase throughout the experiment. Thus, a non-zero gradient moment starts to build up quadratically in the first TE/2 period (γΔMx, solid red line). The refocusing pulse reverses the gradient moment at TE/2. Without an additional motion update, the gradient moment continues to accumulate rapidly (γΔMx solid red line) and reaches a non-zero value at TE. However, if the rotation matrix is updated prior to the refocusing pulse, then the axis of the object is re-aligned with the gradient axis (Δθ, dashed blue line). This results in a final residual gradient moment γΔMx that is markedly smaller (γΔMx, dashed blue line) compared to that obtained without the additional motion update (γΔMx, solid red line). (c) Rotational motion with constant rotational acceleration of r=60°/s2 (0 constant velocity). The overall evolution of the gradient moment is similar to that described in (b) but follows a third-order term in time. Again, without an intra-sequence motion update, the gradient moment continues to accumulate rapidly in the second TE/2 period (γΔMx, solid red line) and reaches a non-zero value at TE. If the rotation matrix is updated prior to the refocusing pulse, the final residual gradient moment is smaller (γΔMx, dashed blue line) compared to that obtained without the additional motion update (γΔMx, solid red line) but still deviates from zero due to the third-order evolution of the gradient moment.