(
A) Immunohistochemistry of coronal sections of cerebellum 2 days post-electroporation. GFP shows the electroporated cells and Pax6 marks pre- and post-mitotic CGNs. Graph shows that 99.6 ± 0.21% of all GFP
+ cells are also Pax6
+. Error bars represent SEM. 198 ctl and 382 mutant GFP
+ cells were counted and pooled from four animals. (
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1) (
B) Graph shows quantification of cell body measurements of GFP
+ CGNs 1-day-post-electroporation as shown in
Figure 5C. Cells can be classified as precursors, of CGNs with unipolar or bipolar morphologies. No difference is seen between controls and
Plxnb2 mutants. Width/length ratio of 74 ctl and 159 mut CGNs from three different pups per genotype were calculated. Bipolar cells: ctl 0.47 ± 0.02
vs. mut 0.45 ± 0.02, MWU(1400) p=0.25; Unipolar cells: ctl 0.42 ± 0.03
vs. mut 0.47 ± 0.02, MWU(382) p=0.43; Precursors: ctl 0.62 ± 0.03
vs. mut 0.57 ± 0.03, MWU(509) p=0.26. Error bars represent SEM. (
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1) (
C) EGL of cerebella electroporated 24 hr before isolation at P8 were equally divided in two bins. Six control and four mutant brains were analyzed. All GFP
+ cells were counted and quantified as multipolar or bipolar. CGN-appearance per bin was then analyzed as a percentage of total CGNs in that morphology. Percentage of all multipolar cells residing in bin 1 ctl 87.5 ± 3.19%
vs. mut 70.41 ± 1.2% MWU(0) p=0.0095; Percentage of all bipolar cells residing in bin 2 ctl 90.22 ± 2.64%
vs. mut 52.24 ± 2.34% MWU(0) p=0.0095; Bipolar in ML ctl 5.19 ± 2.84%
vs. 27.89 ± 4.17% MWU(0) p=0.0095. Error bars represent SEM. (
D) High magnification images of Immunohistochemical staining of
En1Cre;Plxnb2fl/fl P8 brains showing bipolar GFP
+-CGNs that bear both proliferation markers EdU (injected 2 hr before brain isolation) and H3P. (
E) Representative examples of
Plxnb2fl/fl and
En1Cre;Plxnb2fl/fl CGNs 2 days post-electroporation. Axons and leading processes are pointed out. Graphs show axon and leading process lengths, and ratio of cell body width and length. Error bars represent SEM. No significant difference is found in process length (leading process: ctl 28.11 ± 0.72 μm
vs. mut 30.86 ± 1.67 μm, MWU(17024) p=0.27; axon length: ctl 60.07 ± 2.5 μm
vs. mut 64.98 ± 3.0 μm, MWU(17380) p=0.44).
Plxnb2 mutant CGNs in their radial phase appear slightly rounder (width/length ratio ctl 0,47 ± 0.01
vs. mut 0.55 ± 0.01, MWU(13379) p<0.0001). A total of 199 ctl and 183 mut CGNs were analyzed from at least three different pups per genotype. (
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1) (
F) Representative examples of
Plxnb2fl/fl and
En1Cre;Plxnb2fl/fl CGNs, 2 and 3 weeks after electroporation. (
G) Whisker plots show quantification results from cells as in (
F). In P20
En1Cre;Plxnb2fl/fl mutants, more CGNs have acquired their characteristic mature morphology, with 3–4 claw-shaped dendrites. 198 ctl and 251 mutant CGNs at P20, and 204 ctl and 213 mutant CGNs at P30 were analyzed from at least three different pups from each age and genotype. No significant difference was found in cell body measurements at P20 and P30, and the number of dendrites was also similar at P30. However, at P20 a higher portion of mutant CGNs, electroporated at P7 with GFP, already pruned their dendrites to the amount of 4 (MWU(21308) p<0.0001) (
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1). Scale bar (
A, C, D): 10 μm.