Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;6:35. doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00144-0

Table 2.

Clinical use of human cultured epithelial substitutes (CESs).

References Cells Type of clinical study N (male / female) Age (years)a Treatment-related adverse events Indication Total body surface area (TBSA) affected (%)a Affected area covered (%)a or Affected area covered (%TBSA)a TESS successful engraftment (%)a or TESS successful engraftment (% TBSA)a Period between skin biopsy and grafting (days)a Follow-up (months)a Outcomes
41 Autologous epidermal cells Case Report 2 (2/0) 49.5 ± 16.2 (38–61) None Burns 60 ± 28.3 (40–80) 100 14–21 6 Absence of stratum corneum during the first week, but 6 months after grafting, the epidermis could not be distinguished from native skin
42 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 17 (11/6) 31.8 ± 14.4 (2–56) None Burns 56.1 ± 18.3 (31–85) 31 18–22 1–1.5 In some cases, 80% of epithelialized skin was achieved after 6 weeks. Hypertrophic scar formation was less than observed in comparable areas treated with meshed grafts
43 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 26 - None Burns 50 (2–75) 15 (0–98) 7 Limited success
44 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 26 29.03 ± 18.7 (5–80) None Burns 33 ± 16.7 (10–75) 12.5 ± 6.4 (5–35) 32.1 ± 15.3 (0–65) 20–22 6 Keratinocyte culture “take” was significantly lower than that split-thickness skin grafts
4 3.7 ± 1.9 (1–5) None Giant congenital nevus 55.9 ± 30.9 (30–100) 56.2 ± 13.7 (40–70)
45 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 16 29.7 (10–56) None Burns 68.2 (42–85) 15.9 (4–59) 4.7 (0–18.6) 4.3 (1.7–9.2) No impact on the definitive closure of massive burn wounds
46 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 5 (4/1) 38.8 (20–60) None Burns 59.6 (48–70) 93.6 (87–100) 48 Only two patients required any additional grafts to cover open wounds that had originally been covered with CESs
47 Autologus epithelial cells Case Report 28 35.3 None Burns 52.2 10.4 (2–35) 26.9 60 After 5 years of use, CES engraftment was unpredictable and inconsistent. Should be used only as biologic dressing and experimental adjunct to conventional burn wound coverage with split-thickness autograft
48 Autologous keratinocytes Observational Study 29 26 None Burns 77 53 14–18 3 Good cosmetic appearance when compared with meshed split-thickness skin grafting
8 2.8 None Scald wounds 23 73
49 Autologous keratinocytes Case Report 7 (4/3) 11.6 ± 10.7 (1.7–30) None Burns 45.7 ± 19.88 (20–75) 97.1 ± 7.5 14 2–20 Epidermal regeneration evaluated 1 month after grafting was stable and complete. Epidermis appeared fully differentiated with a well-developed stratum granulosum
50 Autologous keratinocytes Non-randomized trial 8 10.5 ± 2 Reconstructive procedures were required in the first 2 years for functional problems Burns 92.5 ± 1.9 44 ± 7 60 ± 8 21 24 After follow-up scars had a significantly smoother surface and less pigmentation than traditional meshed autografts
51 Autologous keratinocytes Non-randomized controlled trial 7 32.1 ± 18 (9–65) None Burns 68.7 ± 20.4 (51–95) 65 ± 46.6 16–22 1 An undulated dermo-epidermal junction was present underneath the grafted epithelia cultured on fibrin gel matrices
52 Autologous epidermal cell sheets Non-randomized controlled trial 14 40.8 ± 18.3 (3–61) None Palmoplantar wounds 100 100 1 27.6 ± 10.5 (12–48) Expression of keratin 9 was continuously observed after the transplantation
53 Autologous keratinocytes Non-randomized controlled trial 7 6.4 ± 1.4 None Burns Reconstructive releases 75.9 ± 5.0 100 12 Successful vascularization was observed in 45.7 ± 14.2% of the wounds, after 14 days
54 Autologous epidermal cells Case Report 2 (2/0) 33 ± 1.4 (32–34) None Burns 75 ± 14.1 (65–85) 0 21–28 0.4 These substitutes could be useful as temporary biological dressing as the take was so poor
55 Allogeneic keratinocytes Retrospective Observational Study 13 (7/6) 62.2 ± 15.7 (34–84) None Chronic skin ulcers 100 100 3.2 ± 2.3 (0.6–7) There was an overall reduction of 91.5% of wound size in comparison with initial value
56 (NCT00832156) Autologous epidermal cells Randomized Controlled Trial (parallel assignment) 40 (25/15) 50 ± 19 (20–85) None Burns 24.2 ± 13 (6–51) 90 ± 12.6 (6–51) 13 12 Epithelialization increased in the wounds after 5–7 days (71.2 ± 24.8%)

aExpression of measures: mean ± standard deviation (range).