TABLE 2.

Comparisons of Stability Model and its submodel with no effects of parenting in late adolescence on adolescents’ emotion regulation patterns.

Model comparison	Δdf	Scaled	p	ΔAIC	ΔR2	ΔR2	ΔR2
		Δχ2 test			Reappraisal	Suppression	Rumination
Self-Reported Parental Autonomy
Stability Model (df = 352) vs.
its submodel with no effects of parenting on ER patterns (df = 358)	6	11.33	0.078	–1.50	–0.011	–0.001	–0.035
Partner-Reported Parental Autonomy
Stability Model (df = 352) vs.
its submodel with no effects of parenting on ER patterns (df = 358)	6	10.46	0.107	–1.04	–0.023	–0.003	–0.012
Self-Reported Parental Intimacy
Stability Model (df = 351) vs.
its submodel with no effects of parenting on ER patterns (df = 357)	6	1.03	0.985	–10.86	–0.000	–0.002	–0.001
Partner-Reported Parental Intimacy
Stability Model (df = 356) vs.
its submodel with no effects of parenting on ER patterns (df = 362)	6	11.40	0.077	0.18	–0.010	–0.006	–0.019

N = 885. As in Table 1, the ΔAIC and ΔR² of reappraisal, suppression, and rumination were calculated by subtracting the estimates of the Stability Model above from its submodel below. AIC = Akaike information criterion; ER = emotion regulation.