Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sleep Med. 2019 Nov 14;71:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.11.1184

Table 4.

Group differences between subjects high and low on nocturnal cognitive arousal on objective sleep disturbances on the baseline night.

Low Cognitive Arousal
n=43/52
High Cognitive Arousal
n=9/52
Sleep latency 20.74±19.89 57.56±44.64 t(50)=3.94***, d=1.07
Latency to persistent sleep 27.14±21.11 72.44±44.17 t(50)=4.72***, d=1.31
Wake after sleep onset 36.83±43.91 81.28±79.10 t(50)=2.37**, d=.69
Sleep efficiency 86.97±12.38 71.06±17.74 t(50)=−3.24**, d=1.04
Total sleep time 6.95±.98 hrs 5.70±1.44 hrs t(50)=−3.17**, d=1.01
MSLT latency 12.12±4.28 mins 15.51±4.18 mins t(50)=2.18*, d=.80

Note: Cognitive arousal was assessed via the Presleep Arousal Scale – Cognitive factor (PSAS-C). Low Cognitive Arousal was defined as baseline PSAS-C scores ≤ 16. High Cognitive Arousal was defined as baseline PSAS-C scores > 16. Sleep latency, Sleep latency (persistent), Wake after sleep onset, Sleep efficiency (Total Sleep Time/Time in Bed), and Total Sleep Time were assessed via polysomnography. Means and Standard Deviations are reported for objective findings. t = t-statistics for independent samples t-tests.

*

p<.05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.

p = significance value for non-significant results. d = Cohen’s d effect size for independent samples t-tests.