Table 2.
The summary of review authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item for included studies.
| Study | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serban et l. (1982) [29] | L | U | L | L | L | U |
| Mani et al. (2000) [27] | U | U | H | L | L | U |
| Parikh et al. (2001) [28] | L | U | H | L | L | L |
| Lee et al. (2008) [26] | L | U | H | L | L | L |
| Kaur et al. (2008) [25] | U | U | H | L | L | L |
| Anitha et al. (2010) [23] | U | U | H | L | L | U |
| Alam et al. (2016) [22] | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| Beihaghi et al. (2017) [24] | L | U | H | L | L | U |
H: high risk of bias; L: low risk of bias; U: unclear or unrevealed risk of bias. Criteria defined for risk of bias assessment are according to the Cochrane guidelines.
According to Cochrane criteria, study consider as a poor quality if it had high risk of bias in ≥2 items or unclear risk of bias in ≥3 criteria.