We read the study entitled ‘Cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: outcomes from a specialist clinic in the UK’ with interest. Adamson et al.1 concluded that cognitive behavioural therapy is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome because fatigue and physical functioning scores improved significantly and 90% were happy with it.
However, the results for chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome were not reported separately which might have inflated their chronic fatigue syndrome results.
Also, there were only physical functioning scores at baseline for 77.2% even though it was a primary outcome which also biased the results.
According to the study, 31% dropped out, yet at follow-up there were only scores for 50.5% (fatigue), 50.9% (social adjustment), 40.6% (physical functioning) and 36.7% (global improvement). Consequently, up to 63.3% dropped out, which further biased the results as most patients only drop out if therapy is harmful or not effective, making it unlikely that 90% were happy with cognitive behavioural therapy.
The study noted that those who dropped out were more ill (worse physical functioning and Work and Social Adjustment scores). Consequently, dropout was non-random, which artificially inflated the results. Despite this, the scores after ‘effective’ treatment were only 18.6 (fatigue) and 58.5 (physical functioning). According to both scores, patients were still ill enough to enter the PACE (Pacing, graded Activity, and Cognitive behaviour therapy: a randomised Evaluation) trial2 by the corresponding author of Adamson et al.
Moreover, according to the literature, a physical functioning score of 65 or less equates to severe disability.3
Why the study did not use objective outcomes is unclear as PACE2 showed that cognitive behavioural therapy doesn’t lead to objective improvement (step test and 6-min walking test).
Conclusion
Patients remained severely disabled after treatment with cognitive behavioural therapy in a specialist clinic in the UK. Therefore, it cannot be said that cognitive behavioural therapy is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome.
Footnotes
ORCID iD:Mark Vink https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-5647
Declarations
Competing Interests: None declared.
References
- 1.Adamson J, Ali S, Santhouse A, Wessely S, Chalder T. Cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: outcomes from a specialist clinic in the UK. J R Soc Med 2020; 113: 394–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.White PD, Goldsmith KA, Johnson AL, Potts L, Walwyn R, DeCesare JC, et al. Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 823–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stulemeijer M, De Jong LW, Fiselier TJ. Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 330: 14. (Erratum in BMJ 2005; 330: 820). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]