Table 4.
Consequent | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M (Weekly hours spent on) | Y (Father-infant bondingb) | |||||||
childcare) | ||||||||
Antecedent | Coeff. | SE | p | Coeff. | SE | p | ||
X (Duration of paternal leavea) | a | 1.258 | 0.550 | 0.022 | c' | −0.700 | 0.353 | 0.048 |
M (Weekly hours spent on childcare) | — | — | — | b | 0.059 | 0.035 | 0.090 | |
C1 (Current status of paternal leave) | f1 | 5.306 | 1.731 | 0.002 | g1 | 0.176 | 0.934 | 0.851 |
C2 (Part-time work during paternal leave) | f2 | 2.470 | 1.680 | 0.141 | g2 | −1.822 | 1.151 | 0.115 |
C3 (Duration of solo paternal leaveb) | f3 | 1.380 | 0.792 | 0.083 | g3 | 0.379 | 0.428 | 0.377 |
C4 (Age) | f4 | −0.338 | 0.132 | 0.012 | g4 | 0.122 | 0.082 | 0.137 |
C5 (Education) | f5 | −2.717 | 1.157 | 0.019 | g5 | −0.666 | 0.708 | 0.347 |
C6 (Partnership satisfactionc) | f6 | −0.096 | 0.148 | 0.518 | g6 | 0.208 | 0.087 | 0.018 |
Constant | iM | 37.077 | 5.356 | < 0.001 | iY | 105.218 | 3.154 | < 0.001 |
R2 = 0.132 | R2 = 0.053 | |||||||
F(7, 373) = 6.158, p < 0.001 | F(8, 372) = 2.073, p = 0.038 |
Simple mediation analysis using ordinary least square regression. Heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors (HC3) employed. N = 381. Outliers and extreme values excluded. X, predictor variable; M, mediator variable; Y, outcome variable; C1−6, confounders; a, effect of X on M; b, effect of M on Y; c', direct effect of X on Y, estimates the difference between X and Y holding M constant; f1−6, effects of C1−6 on M; g1−6, effects of C1−6 on Y; Coeff., unstandardized path coefficients. Significant associations (p < 0.05) are in boldface.
Sum of all paternal leave periods in months until T3.
Sum of all paternal leave periods in months that the father took on his own, i.e., not parallel to maternal leave, until T3.
Short version of the Partnership Questionnaire (“Kurzform des Partnerschaftsfragebogens”, PFB-K).
Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ); reversed items so that higher scores indicate a higher level of father-infant bonding.